Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Gabriel Osa
Human rights activist and political commentator Omoyele Sowore has issued a blistering critique of the United Nations, describing the global body as compromised and irrelevant amid the unfolding crisis in Venezuela triggered by a controversial U.S. military action. Sowore’s comments follow claims by U.S. President Donald J. Trump that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were captured and removed from Venezuela after a large‑scale U.S. strike — a move that has drawn widespread international condemnation and prompted urgent diplomatic responses.
In a statement posted on his X social media account, Sowore argued that recent events illustrate the deep structural flaws of the U.N., asserting that it has devolved into what he called a “ceremonial tea party” incapable of restraining powerful nations from unilateral aggression. He accused President Trump of pursuing an “illegal regime change agenda” in Venezuela and claimed the purported kidnapping of Maduro and his wife represents a stark failure of international governance and accountability.
Sowore contended that the U.N.’s repeated inability to check abuses of power and uphold international law amounts to a profound legitimacy crisis. “Its persistent failure to restrain unilateral aggression, war crimes, and abuses of power exposes a deep and incurable structural rot,” he wrote, arguing that the institution can no longer protect humanity from the “ego, bloodlust, and unchecked ambition” of powerful leaders.
Citing what he views as the U.N.’s impotence, the activist went further, calling for the dissolution of the United Nations and its replacement with a new, credible coalition of nation‑states designed to safeguard justice, human dignity, and collective security. “The UN should be dissolved and replaced with a truly credible coalition of nation‑states — one designed to serve humanity, uphold justice, and prevent tyranny, not legitimize it,” Sowore said.
His remarks come amid a broader international backlash to the U.S. operation. United Nations experts and legal authorities have criticised the U.S. military strikes and the alleged capture of Maduro as violations of international law. A U.N. human rights and counterterrorism expert, Ben Saul, condemned the actions as “illegal aggression,” calling for accountability and respect for the rule of law while emphasising the right to life of all Venezuelans.
The Venezuelan government has also taken its concerns to the global stage, formally requesting an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council to address what it described as “criminal aggression” by the United States. Caracas has charged that the U.S. action aimed at overthrowing its leadership violates core principles of the U.N. Charter and undermines the sovereignty of nation‑states — core tenets of the existing international order.
Reactions among world powers and international organisations have been sharply divided. Several countries, including Russia, Uruguay, and Chile, publicly condemned the U.S. strikes as breaches of international law and called for respect for sovereign integrity, while some leaders in the Western hemisphere offered nuanced or supportive remarks. The European Union and individual European governments emphasised the need for diplomatic solutions anchored in the U.N. Charter, highlighting the body’s continued role in resolving global disputes despite criticism.
Sowore’s assertion about the U.N.’s irrelevance taps into longstanding global debates about the efficacy and fairness of the world’s foremost multilateral institution. Critics of the United Nations often point to its Security Council structure, particularly the veto powers held by permanent members, as mechanisms that can stall meaningful action in the face of aggression or rights abuses — a problem underscored by the Venezuelan government’s frustrated efforts to secure international censure of U.S. actions.
Supporters of the U.N., however, argue that despite its imperfections, the organisation provides a vital forum for dialogue, conflict prevention, humanitarian coordination, and the codification of international norms. They also note that reform efforts — including calls to limit veto power or enhance the representativeness of membership — continue within diplomatic circles precisely because many states perceive limitations in the current structure.
Sowore’s remarks underscore a deepening frustration with existing global governance mechanisms at a moment of heightened geopolitical tension. As world leaders and international institutions grapple with the fallout from the Venezuelan crisis, debates over the relevance, authority, and future of the United Nations are likely to intensify, raising fundamental questions about how sovereign states navigate power, justice, and collective security in a rapidly changing world.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments