Federal Government to Forgo ₦1.4 Trillion in 2026 Revenue as Corporate Tax Cut Takes Effect

Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Gabriel Osa

Nigeria’s Federal Government is set to forgo an estimated ₦1.4 trillion in revenue in 2026 following its decision to reduce the corporate income tax rate from 30 percent to 25 percent, marking one of the most significant fiscal policy shifts in recent years. The move forms a central pillar of the country’s newly consolidated tax reform framework, which authorities say is designed to stimulate investment, support business growth, and reposition the economy for long-term expansion.

The disclosure was made by the Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, who explained that the anticipated revenue loss reflects a deliberate policy choice rather than a fiscal oversight. According to him, the government is prioritising economic competitiveness and sustainability over short-term revenue gains, betting that a broader tax base and stronger private sector activity will ultimately compensate for the immediate shortfall.

The reduction in the corporate income tax rate represents a fundamental shift in Nigeria’s tax philosophy. For decades, the country has relied heavily on relatively high statutory tax rates, even as compliance levels remained low and many businesses operated informally or sought ways to minimise their tax exposure. Policymakers behind the reform argue that a lower rate will encourage compliance, reduce incentives for tax avoidance, and make Nigeria more attractive to both domestic and foreign investors.

Mr. Oyedele noted that while the projected ₦1.4 trillion revenue sacrifice is substantial, it must be viewed within the broader context of economic reform. He said the consolidated tax framework is not solely about cutting rates, but about simplifying the tax system, eliminating distortive levies, and improving administration. In his view, the true cost to the economy has been the complexity and unpredictability of Nigeria’s tax environment, which has often discouraged investment and constrained business expansion.

Corporate income tax is one of the federal government’s major non-oil revenue sources, paid primarily by medium and large companies operating across sectors such as manufacturing, telecommunications, banking, energy, and services. A reduction from 30 percent to 25 percent places Nigeria closer to the average corporate tax rates in many emerging markets, particularly within Africa, where several countries have adopted more competitive regimes to attract capital.

Supporters of the reform say the tax cut could be transformative for businesses struggling with high operating costs, inflationary pressures, foreign exchange volatility, and infrastructure gaps. Lower tax obligations, they argue, would free up capital for reinvestment, expansion, job creation, and innovation. Small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular, are expected to benefit indirectly if larger firms expand supply chains and increase demand for local inputs.

However, the policy has also sparked debate among fiscal analysts and civil society groups concerned about the implications for government revenue and public services. Nigeria faces persistent budget deficits, rising public debt, and mounting demands for spending on security, healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Critics question whether the country can afford such a large revenue sacrifice at a time when many Nigerians are grappling with economic hardship.

In response to these concerns, Mr. Oyedele emphasised that the tax cut is part of a carefully sequenced reform programme rather than an isolated measure. He explained that the consolidated framework includes steps to broaden the tax net, reduce exemptions that no longer serve economic objectives, and improve enforcement through digitalisation and better data integration. By bringing more economic actors into the formal system, the government hopes to generate higher overall revenue even at lower rates.

The reform agenda also seeks to address long-standing complaints from businesses about multiple taxation and overlapping levies imposed by different tiers of government. Industry groups have repeatedly argued that the cumulative tax burden, rather than the headline corporate rate alone, has been a major deterrent to investment. Officials say harmonising taxes and clarifying responsibilities among federal, state, and local authorities is a key component of the new framework.

Economists note that the success of the corporate tax reduction will depend heavily on effective implementation and complementary reforms. Without improvements in infrastructure, power supply, and regulatory certainty, a lower tax rate alone may not be sufficient to unlock the desired level of investment. There are also concerns that if revenue mobilisation does not improve as expected, the government could be forced to borrow more, potentially offsetting the gains from a more business-friendly tax regime.

International experience offers mixed lessons. Some countries that reduced corporate tax rates saw increased investment and higher long-term revenue, while others struggled to replace lost income, particularly where tax administration remained weak. Analysts say Nigeria’s large informal sector and history of tax evasion make enforcement reforms just as important as rate cuts.

For the government, the timing of the policy is also politically and economically significant. With economic reforms already placing pressure on households and businesses, authorities appear eager to signal support for the productive sector and reassure investors of policy stability. The corporate tax cut is being framed as part of a broader effort to reset the economy, shift away from overreliance on oil revenues, and foster inclusive growth driven by private enterprise.

As the 2026 implementation date approaches, attention will increasingly turn to how the reform will be rolled out and how its impact will be measured. Business leaders are expected to push for clarity on transitional arrangements, compliance requirements, and the treatment of existing incentives. Meanwhile, fiscal watchdogs will be watching closely to see whether the promised gains in investment and compliance materialise.

In outlining the policy, Mr. Oyedele stressed that reform is a continuous process rather than a single event. He said the government remains open to adjustments based on evidence and feedback, underscoring that the ultimate goal is a tax system that is fair, efficient, and supportive of economic growth. Whether the ₦1.4 trillion revenue sacrifice proves to be a short-term cost or a long-term investment will depend on how effectively the broader reform agenda is executed in the years ahead.

📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews