Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Gabriel Osa
The Nigerian Defence Academy has firmly denied allegations of negligence following the disappearance of Cadet Stephen Gani, as public concern continues to mount over the circumstances surrounding the case. In a detailed response, the military institution said it has acted responsibly and in line with established procedures, insisting that claims suggesting lapses in duty or care are unfounded and misleading.
Cadet Gani, a member of one of the Academy’s regular courses, was reported missing under circumstances that have not been fully disclosed to the public, sparking speculation and intense debate on social media and in sections of the press. The case has drawn particular attention because of the NDA’s status as Nigeria’s foremost military training institution and the expectations placed on it to ensure the safety and welfare of its cadets.
In its official position, the Academy maintained that once the cadet’s absence was noticed, appropriate internal mechanisms were immediately activated. According to the NDA, routine accountability procedures are a core part of daily life within the institution, and any unexplained absence is treated with seriousness. Officials said the matter was promptly escalated through the chain of command and reported to relevant authorities in accordance with military regulations.
The Academy rejected suggestions that it failed to supervise the cadet or ignored warning signs before his disappearance. It stated that cadets are subject to structured schedules, monitored movements, and strict discipline, adding that no prior indication suggested that Cadet Gani was at risk or planning to abscond. NDA authorities stressed that the training environment, though demanding, is designed to uphold safety, professionalism, and the physical and mental well-being of cadets.
Military sources familiar with the matter explained that investigations are ongoing to determine the exact circumstances of the disappearance. These inquiries reportedly involve collaboration with security agencies beyond the Academy, reflecting what officials described as a transparent and comprehensive approach. The NDA said it is committed to uncovering the truth, regardless of where it may lead, and to ensuring accountability if any wrongdoing is eventually established.
Family members of the missing cadet have expressed distress and frustration, calling for greater clarity and faster action. Their concerns have resonated with a wider audience, prompting questions about how such an incident could occur within a tightly controlled military environment. Human rights advocates and some commentators have urged the authorities to handle the case with openness and sensitivity, noting the emotional toll on the cadet’s relatives.
In response, the Academy said it has maintained communication with the family and assured them of its cooperation. Officials emphasised that while operational details cannot always be made public during an active investigation, the institution has no intention of shielding anyone from scrutiny. They described the circulating allegations of negligence as premature and potentially harmful to both the investigation and the morale of cadets currently undergoing training.
The NDA also addressed broader narratives suggesting systemic issues within military training institutions. It argued that isolated incidents should not be used to undermine the reputation of an organisation that has produced generations of officers who serve with distinction at home and abroad. While acknowledging that no institution is immune from challenges, the Academy said it continuously reviews and updates its policies to meet evolving security and welfare standards.
Security analysts note that cases involving missing military personnel are particularly sensitive, given the nature of military training and operations. They point out that such incidents often attract speculation before facts are fully established, making careful communication essential. Some analysts have called for an independent review once investigations are concluded, to reassure the public and reinforce confidence in military institutions.
The Defence Headquarters has reportedly been briefed on the situation, underscoring the seriousness with which the matter is being treated at the highest levels. Although no timeline has been publicly given for the conclusion of investigations, officials indicated that progress is being made and that updates will be provided when appropriate.
For many Nigerians, the case of Cadet Stephen Gani touches on broader concerns about accountability, transparency, and the duty of care owed to young people who commit themselves to national service. The NDA’s strong denial of negligence reflects an awareness of these concerns and an effort to protect its institutional credibility while the search for answers continues.
As investigations proceed, attention remains focused on whether Cadet Gani will be located and what conclusions will emerge about the events leading to his disappearance. Until then, the Academy has appealed for restraint in public commentary, urging citizens to avoid spreading unverified claims that could complicate efforts to resolve the case.
The disappearance of a cadet is an unusual and troubling event, and its eventual resolution will likely have implications beyond the individual case. It may prompt renewed scrutiny of training protocols, welfare monitoring, and crisis response mechanisms within military institutions. For now, the Nigerian Defence Academy insists that it has acted within the bounds of its responsibilities and remains committed to uncovering the truth surrounding Cadet Stephen Gani’s whereabouts.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments