Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Gabriel Osa
Former Niger Delta militant leader Asari Dokubo has alleged the existence of a covert arrangement between the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and officials in the United States, declaring that he would take steps to frustrate any such agreement if proven to undermine Nigeria’s sovereignty.
Dokubo made the claim during a recent public address, where he accused IPOB of engaging in undisclosed discussions aimed at securing foreign backing for its separatist agenda. He did not present documentary evidence to substantiate the assertion but insisted that intelligence available to him suggested ongoing contacts outside Nigeria.
IPOB, a separatist organization advocating for the creation of an independent Biafran state in southeastern Nigeria, has been at the center of political and security tensions in recent years. The Nigerian government designated the group a terrorist organization in 2017, a classification that IPOB disputes. The group maintains that its campaign is rooted in self-determination and peaceful advocacy, although authorities have linked it to episodes of violence in the region.
In his remarks, Dokubo characterized the alleged engagement with U.S. entities as an attempt to internationalize the separatist struggle. He warned that any foreign involvement in Nigeria’s internal political matters could escalate tensions and complicate national unity efforts. He further pledged to mobilize opposition against what he described as external interference.
There has been no official confirmation from the United States government regarding any formal agreement or partnership with IPOB. U.S. diplomatic policy toward Nigeria has consistently emphasized support for democratic governance, human rights, and territorial integrity. Washington has not recognized any separatist movement within Nigeria as a legitimate political entity.
IPOB has, in the past, sought international attention through diaspora advocacy and lobbying efforts in Western capitals. Such activities are common among separatist or self-determination movements globally and typically involve public demonstrations, legal advocacy, and outreach to policymakers. However, no verified evidence has emerged to indicate that the U.S. government has entered into a binding or secret arrangement with the group.
Dokubo’s intervention adds another layer to the complex political landscape surrounding separatist movements and regional activism in Nigeria. Although he was once a prominent figure in the Niger Delta militancy that targeted oil infrastructure in the mid-2000s, Dokubo has since repositioned himself as a vocal commentator on national unity and security matters.
Political analysts note that public allegations of foreign involvement in separatist causes can carry significant diplomatic implications. Claims of clandestine agreements, particularly involving a global power such as the United States, often require substantial evidence before being treated as credible by international observers.
Within Nigeria, reactions to Dokubo’s statement have been mixed. Supporters argue that vigilance is necessary to prevent external actors from influencing domestic political issues. Critics, however, caution against amplifying unverified claims that could inflame tensions or strain diplomatic relations.
Security experts observe that separatist movements frequently pursue international visibility to legitimize their demands, but such efforts do not automatically translate into formal governmental recognition or support. International law generally prioritizes the territorial integrity of recognized sovereign states unless exceptional circumstances arise.
The Nigerian government has consistently reiterated its commitment to preserving national unity while addressing grievances through constitutional channels. Dialogue, economic development initiatives, and security operations have formed part of the federal response to unrest in the southeast.
As of now, neither IPOB nor U.S. officials have publicly responded in detail to Dokubo’s specific allegations. The absence of corroborating evidence leaves the claim within the realm of political assertion rather than established fact.
Observers emphasize that developments involving separatist movements and international actors require careful scrutiny to distinguish between advocacy efforts, diplomatic engagement, and formal policy positions. In highly sensitive political contexts, rhetoric can quickly shape public perception even in the absence of verified documentation.
Dokubo’s vow to oppose any alleged arrangement underscores ongoing rivalries and ideological divisions among various activist and political factions within Nigeria. While his statement has generated debate, its long-term impact will likely depend on whether further evidence emerges or whether official clarifications are issued.
For now, the allegation remains unverified, and the broader diplomatic posture between Nigeria and the United States appears unchanged. As discussions around national unity and regional autonomy continue, statements from influential figures such as Dokubo are expected to remain part of Nigeria’s evolving political discourse.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments