Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Gabriel Osa
A Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a major criminal case against suspended Deputy Commissioner of Police Abba Kyari and his two younger brothers, bringing an end to a years-long legal battle over allegations that the former police intelligence chief concealed assets and disguised property ownership. The decision, delivered on March 5, 2026, concluded that prosecutors failed to provide sufficient evidence linking Kyari to the properties and financial holdings cited in the charges.
Justice James Omotosho ruled that the prosecution, led by Nigeria’s National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, did not meet the legal threshold required in criminal trials. The judge stated that the agency failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Kyari and his brothers, Mohammed Kyari and Ali Kyari, deliberately failed to disclose assets or conspired to conceal them. As a result, the court discharged and acquitted the three defendants, ending the asset declaration case that had been pending since 2022.
The case originated after the anti-narcotics agency accused the suspended police officer of hiding several properties and financial assets. Prosecutors alleged that investigations uncovered fourteen assets allegedly linked to Kyari, including shopping malls, residential estates, farmlands, plots of land, and a polo playground located in Abuja and Maiduguri in Borno State. The agency further claimed that more than 207 million naira and €17,598 were discovered in bank accounts associated with him across several Nigerian financial institutions.
According to the prosecution’s filings, the assets were not properly declared and were allegedly concealed through arrangements involving Kyari’s brothers. The charges included counts of conspiracy, non-declaration of assets, disguising ownership of property, and conversion of funds. The case was filed under provisions of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act and Nigeria’s Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act.
During the trial, the NDLEA presented multiple witnesses and documentary exhibits in an attempt to prove that the properties and financial holdings belonged to the suspended police officer. Investigators argued that the assets had been acquired and managed through indirect ownership structures designed to conceal the true beneficiary. However, defence lawyers challenged these claims and argued that the prosecution relied largely on assumptions rather than legally verifiable proof of ownership.
Kyari himself testified in court and denied owning several of the properties listed in the charges. He told the court that some of the assets located in Maiduguri were inherited family properties belonging to his late father, who had a large extended family with many children. According to Kyari’s testimony, those properties were shared among relatives and were not solely his personal assets.
The court examined the evidence presented by both sides and ultimately concluded that the prosecution did not establish legal ownership of the properties attributed to Kyari. Justice Omotosho explained that Nigerian law requires property ownership to be proven through credible evidence such as title documents, verifiable historical records, or acts demonstrating possession or control. The judge found that the NDLEA failed to provide such documentation linking Kyari directly to several key properties cited in the charges.
The judge also ruled that the conspiracy allegations against Kyari’s brothers were not substantiated. Prosecutors had claimed the brothers assisted in disguising ownership of assets by swearing affidavits and holding property in their names. However, the court held that there was no convincing evidence showing a coordinated criminal arrangement or deliberate attempt to conceal assets.
In his judgment, Justice Omotosho went further to describe the prosecution’s case as lacking credible evidentiary support and suggested that the charges appeared closer to persecution than a properly proven criminal case. The ruling therefore discharged the defendants and formally acquitted them of all counts in the indictment.
The asset declaration case had attracted national attention because of Kyari’s controversial reputation within Nigeria’s law enforcement landscape. Before his suspension, he served as head of the Nigeria Police Force Intelligence Response Team, an elite investigative unit responsible for tackling kidnapping, armed robbery, and other serious crimes. During that period, he gained a reputation as one of the country’s most prominent crime-fighting officers.
However, his career later became overshadowed by multiple allegations and investigations. In 2021, United States authorities accused him of involvement in a case linked to international internet fraudster Ramon Abbas, widely known as Hushpuppi. That controversy led to his suspension from the Nigeria Police Force while authorities examined the allegations. Subsequent investigations by Nigeria’s anti-narcotics agency led to the separate drug-related charges that eventually resulted in the asset declaration case.
Despite his acquittal in the asset case, Kyari remains involved in another ongoing criminal proceeding related to alleged cocaine trafficking. That trial, which involves Kyari and several other police officers accused of tampering with seized narcotics, is still pending before a different Federal High Court judge in Abuja. The outcome of the asset declaration case therefore does not affect the continuation of that prosecution.
Stone Reporters note that the court’s decision has triggered renewed debate across Nigeria about the challenges involved in prosecuting complex financial and corruption-related crimes. Legal analysts say cases involving asset ownership and money laundering often depend heavily on documentary evidence and clear ownership trails, which can be difficult for investigators to establish. The ruling also raises broader questions about investigative procedures, prosecutorial strategy, and the standards required to secure convictions in high-profile corruption cases.
The judgment effectively closes one major legal chapter in the series of investigations surrounding the suspended police officer. Yet the unresolved drug-related proceedings mean that Abba Kyari’s legal battles are far from over, leaving the final outcome of his career and reputation uncertain as Nigeria’s courts continue to examine the remaining allegations against him.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments