Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Gabriel Osa
Former Aviation Minister Stella Oduah and her co-defendant have taken significant steps toward resolving an alleged ₦2.5 billion fraud case against them by signalling their intention to enter into plea-bargain negotiations with the Federal Government, including beginning the process of refunding money the prosecution says was unlawfully obtained. The development was disclosed during proceedings at the Federal High Court, Abuja on Thursday, March 5, 2026.
The case relates to charges brought in December 2025 by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation alleging that Oduah and her co-accused, Gloria Odita, conspired to unlawfully obtain about ₦2.469 billion from the Federal Ministry of Aviation through two companies—Broad Waters Resources Nigeria Ltd and Global Offshore Marine Ltd—by falsely representing payments as being for “Cost of Technical Supervision” and “Security Integrated and Logistics Support Services.” Prosecutors say these characterisations were untrue and constituted offences under Sections 8(a) and 1(1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, punishable under Section 1(3) of the same statute.
The Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo, informed the court that Oduah and her co-defendant had approached the Office of the Attorney-General to initiate discussions under a plea-bargaining framework. He told the judge that both defendants had begun making arrangements to refund part of the funds alleged to have been obtained unlawfully into the government’s coffers, and that the only outstanding procedural step was the confirmation of receipt of the bank draft from the government.
Oyedepo noted that the plea bargain application was made in line with Section 270 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, which allows criminal matters to be resolved through negotiated settlements where defendants agree to restitution of proceeds of crime or other conditions as determined by the prosecuting authority.
Representing Oduah in court, senior advocate Onyechi Ikpeazu confirmed that discussions were ongoing between the defence and prosecution regarding the terms of the proposed settlement. The defence counsel for Odita, Favour Osuanya, also acknowledged that negotiations for a plea-bargain deal were in progress. Neither defence team disclosed the precise amount already refunded or the detailed terms under negotiation, and the court was told that further information would be provided once the agreement was finalised.
Presiding judge Hamza Muazu adjourned the case until March 26, 2026, to allow both sides to report back on the status of the plea-bargain discussions and confirm whether an agreement has been reached. The adjournment was granted after prosecution and defence presented their updates on the procedural progress of plea negotiations.
Both defendants originally pleaded not guilty to the five-count criminal charge when arraigned, which included allegations of fraud, obtaining money by false pretence, and criminal breach of trust related to contracts awarded during Oduah’s ministerial tenure.
Oduah’s legal challenges extend beyond the fraud trial now the subject of the plea bargain application. In recent years she has faced other legal actions, including allegations relating to falsification of documents, notably the Nigerian Youth Service Corps (NYSC) certificate issue, and an earlier fraud charge involving about ₦5 billion that was approved for prosecution in 2022. She also served as a senator representing Anambra North Senatorial District between 2015 and 2023.
Legal analysts say the outcome of the plea-bargain negotiations will be closely watched, as it may influence how high-profile corruption cases involving former public office holders are resolved in Nigeria. Plea bargains can result in reduced sentences or alternative resolutions in exchange for restitution, cooperation, or other conditions, although critics argue that such outcomes may be perceived as offering leniency without full judicial adjudication of guilt.
Civil society groups and anti-corruption advocates have frequently called for greater transparency and accountability in the handling of public funds, especially in sectors like aviation that involve significant government expenditure and oversight. They argue that high-profile cases such as this should reinforce institutional checks and deter misconduct in public office.
If the defendants and the Attorney-General’s Office successfully conclude a plea-bargain agreement, the March 26 court session will likely determine whether the court will formally adopt the settlement and issue a judgment or whether the matter will proceed to a full trial. In either scenario, the case remains a significant example of Nigeria’s efforts to address alleged corruption through both prosecution and negotiated legal mechanisms.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments