Reported by: Oahimire Omone Precious | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has issued a formal response to reports about a controversial courtroom incident involving Honourable Justice Mohammed Umar of the Federal High Court, Abuja, and Mr. Marshall Abubakar, the lead defence counsel for activist and publisher Omoyele Sowore. The incident reportedly occurred on Monday, 16 March 2026, during proceedings in which counsel raised his voice while addressing the court over the suitability of a hearing date.
According to reports, the trial judge allegedly directed Mr. Abubakar to step out of the Bar and kneel down, while also issuing threats of committal for contempt. The NBA emphasised that no Nigerian judge has the power to compel a legal practitioner to kneel in court and that such actions are not recognised judicial sanctions under national law.
In an official statement, the NBA stressed that the courtroom is a temple of justice and that judicial authority must be exercised strictly within the bounds of the law and established procedures. While judges are empowered to maintain order and discipline, including punishing contempt, these powers must adhere to defined legal processes designed to ensure fairness, objectivity, and respect for the dignity of all court participants.
The NBA highlighted that directing a lawyer—or any individual—to kneel in court contravenes recognised judicial standards and undermines the decorum and dignity expected on the Bench. The Association reiterated that any allegations of contempt should follow the accepted procedures set out in law, ensuring that the rights and professional status of legal practitioners are fully respected.
While condemning the alleged actions of the judge, the NBA also reminded lawyers of their responsibilities to maintain professionalism, restraint, and respect for the court. Lawyers are entitled to advocate firmly and fearlessly on behalf of their clients, but such advocacy must remain within the bounds of courtesy and decorum. Disagreements with the court, however strongly felt, should be expressed through proper legal channels without disrupting proceedings or undermining judicial authority.
The NBA described the incident as a threat to the essential balance between the Bar and the Bench, which it said is fundamental to the proper administration of justice in Nigeria. The Association called for calm and restraint on all sides and urged that any grievances arising from courtroom conduct be addressed through institutional and disciplinary mechanisms.
Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, President of the Nigerian Bar Association, stated that the NBA would engage with relevant authorities where necessary to ensure adherence to the rule of law, professional standards, and judicial ethics. The Association emphasised its commitment to safeguarding the integrity of both the legal profession and the judiciary.
The controversy has drawn attention from the legal community and the public, highlighting the ongoing need for clear protocols governing courtroom conduct, the exercise of judicial powers, and the rights of legal practitioners. Observers note that maintaining mutual respect between judges and lawyers is essential to preserving confidence in the justice system and ensuring that court proceedings are conducted with dignity, fairness, and procedural propriety.
The Federal High Court case has been adjourned to 13 April 2026 for further proceedings, and both legal and civil rights communities are watching developments closely, particularly how courtroom conduct and professional decorum are maintained in high-profile trials that attract public scrutiny.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments