Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
In a dramatic and widely reported development this week, renowned Nigerian actor and businessman Aremu Afolayan has issued a public apology following intense national backlash over remarks he made about the country’s security situation and his support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The reversal, delivered in an emotional video message that circulated widely on social media on March 19, 2026, comes after days of controversy that sparked fierce debate across Nigeria’s political and cultural landscape.
The controversy began earlier this month at a political gathering sponsored by EKO57, a Lagos-based support group mobilising backing for President Tinubu’s anticipated 2027 re-election bid. Afolayan, who addressed the event alongside other public figures, expressed enthusiastic support for the president while offering his personal perspective on Nigeria’s challenges.
In a video that quickly went viral, Afolayan praised aspects of the Tinubu administration, including its diplomatic efforts such as the lifting of visa restrictions imposed by the United Arab Emirates, which he said had once affected his own business operations. However, his commentary soon sparked controversy when he appeared to dismiss the everyday struggles of ordinary Nigerians and downplay deeply felt concerns about insecurity. “When people say the country is hard, I don’t really care because I’m doing very well,” he said, according to online reports — a statement that angered many who have been grappling with inflation, unemployment and economic hardship.
The most incendiary part of Afolayan’s remarks came when he addressed the issue of insecurity: “When you watch the news about insurgency, don’t mind them, it’s all scripted,” he was quoted as saying by some outlets. That line struck a raw nerve in a country where communities across several states continue to suffer frequent attacks by armed groups, kidnappers and criminal gangs. Critics immediately lambasted what they saw as a cavalier dismissal of a crisis that has displaced families, disrupted farming and trade, and claimed countless lives.
Following the widespread outrage, Nigerians took to social media to voice their disapproval, with many accusing Afolayan of being out of touch, insensitive or even “paid” to make his statements — accusations that underscored the deep frustration many citizens feel toward political elites and celebrity endorsements of government figures. The online reaction was so overwhelming that it prompted a swift response from Afolayan himself.
In the apology video, Afolayan adopted a markedly different tone. He stood before the camera with a somber expression, appealing directly to Nigerians to forgive him for his earlier comments. “I’m sorry,” he said, acknowledging that his remarks had hurt many people. He conceded that insecurity is “in town and everywhere in Nigeria” and said that his earlier attempt to minimise or reinterpret the crisis was misguided.
Seeking to clarify his intentions, Afolayan explained that his remarks about insecurity were badly expressed. He suggested that what he had meant was to criticise those who dismiss or gloss over the real suffering with reassurances that “everything will be fine” — a nuance that was lost in the original clip. To make his point, he shared a personal anecdote: the mother of his close friend was reportedly kidnapped, and a large ransom had to be paid for her release, underscoring the severity of insecurity in Nigeria.
The actor admitted that the online backlash left him “sober” and reflective, acknowledging that the volume of criticism was heavy and painful. He also denied allegations that he had accepted payment to deliver his original remarks, insisting that he spoke from personal belief, even though the result was widely condemned.
Perhaps most notably, Afolayan announced that he was withdrawing from political commentary and would no longer participate in partisan political activities. He explained that his appearance at the EKO57 event was motivated not by a desire to campaign for specific candidates but rather to support a colleague and engage with community leaders. He said he now intends to focus on his career and stay “with his people,” though he did not rule out future engagement on social issues in a more measured way.
The incident has reignited broader discussions in Nigeria about the role of celebrities in political discourse, especially in a nation struggling with pressing issues like security, inflation, infrastructure decay and social inequality. Observers note that Afolayan’s experience is emblematic of the risks faced by public figures who wade into contentious political waters without fully anticipating the reaction of a frustrated citizenry. Many Nigerians have argued that while celebrities have a right to express their views, they also carry a responsibility to understand and reflect the lived realities of ordinary people.
Public reaction to Afolayan’s apology has been mixed. Some social media users praised him for humility and courage in admitting error and acknowledging the severity of insecurity, describing the apology as a sign of maturity and respect for Nigerians’ lived experiences. Others remained critical, suggesting that the reversal was driven more by public pressure than genuine change of heart. Many commentators also questioned the sincerity of his commitment to avoid political engagement in the future, arguing that the core issues — dissatisfaction with governance and insecurity — will continue to draw voices from all sectors of society.
This episode also highlights the broader, persistent frustration many Nigerians feel toward the federal government’s handling of security and economic issues. Despite official assurances and periodic government statements about progress in combating banditry, insurgency and kidnapping, many communities continue to report regular attacks and minimal protection from security forces. Analysts have long pointed out that Nigeria’s security architecture remains under significant strain, with critics arguing that responses have been reactive and poorly coordinated, leaving civilians exposed and vulnerable.
Political commentators suggest that as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections, issues like insecurity, economic hardship and governance credibility will remain central themes. The controversy surrounding Afolayan’s comments and subsequent apology may be seen as a microcosm of the larger national conversation about accountability, leadership and the gap between official narratives and public experience.
For many Nigerians, this incident has become more than just a celebrity misstep; it serves as a flashpoint in an ongoing debate about how public figures, governments and citizens interact amid deepening socio-political challenges. Whether the fallout from this episode will lead to more substantive engagement or lasting changes in how such issues are discussed remains to be seen.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments