Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The dispute involving Nigerian businesswoman Tracy Nicholas Ohiri and the Minister of Works, Dave Umahi, has resurfaced following renewed public statements and claims regarding unpaid funds and the circumstances surrounding a retraction video issued earlier this year.
The controversy began earlier in 2026 when Ohiri publicly accused Minister Umahi of failing to pay her for services she claimed to have provided during political campaigns and of attempting to manipulate her. These allegations quickly drew attention on social media and among civil society groups, touching on issues of financial accountability, harassment, and the use of political influence.
At the peak of the dispute, Ohiri released a retraction video in which she withdrew her allegations of harassment and misconduct, stating that some of her claims had been misrepresented or exaggerated. She apologized to the minister, his family, and others affected, asserting that no formal contract existed for some of the services she claimed to have delivered.
Despite the retraction, Ohiri has now claimed that she has not received full payment for the services she rendered and that she was coerced into making the retraction video. She specifically alleged that Barrister Marshall Abubakar, acting as the minister’s legal representative, persuaded her to issue the statement clearing Umahi of her prior criticisms, with the understanding that this would lead to a financial settlement. She says part of the promised payment remains unpaid.
The allegations have raised questions about the legality and ethics of informal settlements involving public officials and private individuals. Legal observers note that the absence of formal written agreements complicates claims of unpaid compensation, but public claims of coercion and manipulation could also have professional and reputational implications for those involved.
Minister Umahi has not issued a detailed response to Ohiri’s renewed claims, though his office previously dismissed her allegations as unfounded. Barrister Marshall Abubakar has also not commented publicly. Analysts suggest that if formal agreements exist or can be documented, Ohiri may pursue legal action to enforce payment or seek damages.
The dispute has generated significant public attention, with civil society groups and activists calling for transparency and accountability. Observers note that the situation highlights broader concerns in Nigeria regarding the interaction of business, politics, and legal processes, as well as the role of social media in shaping public perception.
As the matter continues to unfold, all eyes are on whether the alleged unpaid funds will be addressed and whether further legal or political consequences may arise from Ohiri’s renewed allegations. The case remains a high-profile example of the complex interplay between private agreements and public office in Nigeria.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments