Reported by: Oahimire Omone Precious | Edited by: Gabriel Osa
The Nigeria Police Force has invited the Acting Chairman of Etsako East Local Government Area of Edo State, Sunday Akiotu, for questioning over allegations of financial misconduct involving more than ₦100 million in council funds, in a case that is fast becoming a broader test of accountability, local government oversight, and political control in Edo State. The invitation was issued by the Police Special Fraud Unit in Ikoyi, Lagos, following a petition submitted by the Integrity Advocacy for Development Initiative, a civil society group that accused the council leadership of suspicious fund movements, procurement irregularities, and possible abuse of office. According to current reporting, Akiotu is expected to appear before investigators on March 25, 2026.
The case, as presently outlined in media reports, is still at the investigative stage. No formal charge has been announced, and the allegations have not been proven in court. That distinction is important. What the police invitation confirms is not guilt, but that the matter has advanced beyond rumor into a formal fraud inquiry being handled by a specialist police unit. Reports say the case is being managed by the Stock and Capital Market Fraud Section of the PSFU, a detail that suggests investigators view the transactions in question as sufficiently complex to require a financial-crimes lens rather than a routine administrative review.
At the center of the complaint is the claim that more than ₦100 million belonging to Etsako East Local Government, including both statutory allocations and internally generated revenue, was moved through channels that petitioners say require urgent clarification. The petition reportedly names two private entities, EXPESON Logistics and Filmanson Nigeria Limited, and asks police to determine the exact nature of their engagements with the council and whether proper procurement and payment procedures were followed. This is one of the most consequential parts of the case, because if investigators conclude that public money was routed through companies without verifiable contractual justification, the issue would move from administrative controversy into possible criminal exposure.
The probe is not limited to Akiotu alone. Two other council officials, Ahonsi Charles, identified as Director of Administration and General Services, and Otaru Gospel, identified as Head of Budget, Planning and Statistics, were earlier questioned by investigators. Other reports also say the council’s Director of Finance, Obiefi or Ohiafi Kehinde Andrew, was mentioned in the petition as an official allegedly pressured to process some of the disputed payments. Those details matter because they indicate that investigators are likely examining the internal chain through which transactions were initiated, approved, documented, and executed. In financial misconduct cases, that institutional trail often determines whether the issue is attributed to a single officeholder or to a wider internal system failure.
A major part of the allegation concerns internal pressure within the local government. The petitioners reportedly claimed that finance officials were subjected to intimidation in relation to processing certain payments, including the issuing of cheques to the companies named in the complaint. That claim has not been independently verified, but if substantiated, it would significantly deepen the seriousness of the case. It would suggest not only disputed disbursements, but a possible breakdown in internal financial controls and a weakening of the safeguards that should protect public funds at council level.
The story also has a political dimension that goes beyond the immediate money trail. The petition questions the process by which Akiotu emerged as Acting Chairman, alleging that on September 22, 2025, he rose from Acting Councillor to Speaker of the Legislative Arm and then to Acting Chairman in less than 20 minutes, before being sworn in the following day. Some accounts add that he later assumed a leadership position within the Association of Local Governments of Nigeria in Edo State. On its own, a dispute over succession procedure does not prove financial wrongdoing. But politically, it helps explain why the case is attracting attention beyond Etsako East. Critics appear to be framing the issue not only as a fraud inquiry, but as a dispute about how authority was accumulated and exercised inside the council.
That wider context matters because Edo State’s local government system has already been under intense scrutiny. In late 2024 and early 2025, the suspension of elected council chairmen by the Edo State House of Assembly, following demands for financial records, generated major legal and political controversy. The issue triggered disputes over local government autonomy, state oversight, and the limits of executive and legislative interference in council affairs. Reports from that period show that the Edo government and opposition forces sharply disagreed over both the legality of the suspensions and the handling of council finances. That background does not directly establish the truth of the current allegations against Akiotu, but it shows the present probe is unfolding in a state where control of local governments and access to their finances are already politically charged questions.
The present case therefore sits at the intersection of three sensitive issues. The first is the criminal question: whether more than ₦100 million in public funds was diverted, misapplied, or processed in breach of due process. The second is the governance question: whether Etsako East’s internal financial and administrative controls were robust enough to prevent questionable payments. The third is the political question: whether the controversy reflects deeper instability in Edo’s local government structure after months of dispute over suspensions, impeachments, and acting appointments.
For now, the facts that can be stated with confidence are narrower than the allegations circulating around them. Akiotu has been invited by the Police Special Fraud Unit. The inquiry is tied to a petition from a civil society group. The complaint references more than ₦100 million, names two private companies, and has already drawn in other council officials for questioning. As of the latest reporting, Akiotu and the other officials mentioned had not issued a public response to the allegations. Until investigators release more documents, or charges are filed, the case remains an active inquiry rather than a concluded scandal.
What happens next will determine whether this story remains a politically charged allegation or becomes one of the more significant local government fraud cases in Edo in recent years. If police obtain bank records, payment authorizations, procurement files, and company documentation that clearly support the petition, the matter could widen quickly and possibly draw in anti-corruption agencies. If the records show legitimate contracts and lawful approvals, the case could instead collapse into a political dispute inflated by hostile petitioning. At this stage, the central reality is that a specialist fraud investigation is underway, public money is at issue, and the burden has shifted to the investigative process to establish whether the allegations point to criminal diversion, administrative abuse, or a conflict that is more political than prosecutorial.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments