Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
Abuja, Nigeria — A deepening leadership battle within the African Democratic Congress (ADC), a rising political party in Nigeria, has erupted into a full‑blown crisis that now extends from the courtroom to the nation’s political future, triggering denunciations from foreign envoys, legal challenges, strategic opposition realignments, and fears of diminished democratic competition ahead of the 2027 general elections.
At the centre of the storm this week was a public statement by Reno Omokri, Nigeria’s ambassador to Mexico and a widely followed political commentator, who sharply criticised the leadership of the ADC, describing the party as a “professional party of jumpers” and asserting that its current deregistration by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) resulted from actions taken by the party’s own leaders rather than any external interference. His remarks underline the widening fissures within the party’s ranks and the broader implications for Nigeria’s fragile multiparty system.
Omokri’s statement, titled “INEC De‑registration: ADC Professional Party Jumpers Have Only Themselves to Blame,” accused the faction led by former Senate President David Mark of engineering the current predicament by choosing to appeal a court ruling and then failing to adhere to directives from the Court of Appeal. Omokri argued that rather than seeking to exploit legal processes strategically, the faction should have complied with the law, stressing that attempts to incite public anger against INEC were “risky and desperate.” He also contended that many of the party’s leaders entered the ADC for business and personal advantage rather than genuine democratic commitment, a critique that strikes at the core of the party’s credibility.
The controversy stems from a prolonged leadership tussle that erupted in 2025 after Chief Ralph Okey Nwosu, a key founder and pioneer national chairman of the ADC, stepped down — paving the way for Senator David Mark as National Chairman and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary. That leadership transition was challenged in court by Nafiu Bala Gombe, a former deputy national chairman, who argued that the process violated the party’s constitution and internal agreements. The leadership dispute has since fractured the ADC into rival camps, each asserting legitimacy over party structures.
In March 2026, the Court of Appeal directed both factions to maintain the status quo ante bellum, meaning that no party congresses, conventions, or leadership changes could take effect until a substantive judgment is delivered in the Federal High Court. INEC, citing that directive, responded by suspending recognition of all contested leadership structures and removing the names of the David Mark‑led National Working Committee from its official registry of political parties, effectively leaving the ADC with no recognised leadership.
The party’s response to these developments has been furious and divided. While the Mark faction has rejected INEC’s interpretation of the appellate court order and insisted that it will proceed with plans for a national convention, other ADC officials have scrambled to clarify internal positions. In press statements, the party’s National Publicity Secretary Bolaji Abdullahi categorically denied rumours that David Mark had resigned as national chairman, labelling such claims as fake news and warning against attempts to sow confusion among party members.
Amid these competing narratives, ADC’s leadership has also tried to pursue broader strategies. The party announced the creation of a Special Representatives Network aimed at engaging foreign capitals and international democratic actors, framing this effort as a defence of democratic principles in the face of what it perceives as growing threats to opposition parties in Nigeria. This initiative emerged even while the ADC grapples with its internal fracturing and legal battles.
The controversy has also spilled into realpolitik calculations, with reports that some high‑profile figures considering joining the ADC — including sitting governors and lawmakers — have placed such plans on hold amid the party’s uncertain legal status and leadership vacuum. Sources close to some governors indicated that their consultations about joining the ADC have slowed considerably following INEC’s deregistration action.
Legal experts and political analysts have weighed in on the turmoil, arguing that the dispute highlights longstanding structural weaknesses in Nigeria’s party politics, especially among emerging opposition parties striving to coalesce around shared platforms. Some lawyers have attributed the crisis primarily to internal legal disputes and breaches of party agreements rather than external interference, suggesting that poor governance within party ranks often precipitates such breakdowns.
Beyond the leadership dispute, there are broader constitutional questions looming. Another ongoing lawsuit — filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators — seeks to compel INEC to deregister the ADC entirely and other parties that fail to meet minimum electoral performance thresholds, potentially ending the party’s existence if the court rules in favour of the petition. This case, separate from the leadership issue, poses a far steeper threat to the ADC’s future.
Political stakeholders outside the party have also entered the fray. The All Progressives Congress — Nigeria’s ruling party — has publicly listed alleged errors by the Mark faction as evidence that the party’s struggles are self‑inflicted, insisting that the debate should focus on internal accountability rather than blaming external actors. Meanwhile, the Inter‑Party Advisory Council has cautioned INEC about its handling of the dispute, warning that perceived partiality could undermine confidence in the electoral process ahead of the 2027 elections.
Critics of INEC’s decision warn that the deregistration of ADC’s leadership just months before critical electoral processes could disadvantage opposition forces and erode competitive politics in Nigeria. Some opposition figures have expressed concern that the commission’s actions — interpreted by some as alignment with executive interests — threaten to reduce opposition parties’ ability to field candidates, weakening democratic choice for Nigerian voters.
As the ADC’s internal crisis intensifies, the party faces fundamental questions about its unity, governance, and role in Nigeria’s electoral future. With national elections approaching and legal disputes far from resolved, the party’s ability to reconcile its factions and secure recognition from INEC will be decisive in whether it remains a credible force in the national political arena.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments