Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The Nigerian Navy has officially dismissed a serving rating, SMUW Bello M (MX14540), who has been absent from duty without official leave for a staggering 1,346 days – approximately four years. The announcement, contained in a statement released on Saturday, April 25, 2026, confirmed that the personnel was found guilty of desertion, a serious breach of military discipline that carries severe consequences under naval service regulations. The Navy also issued a public warning, informing citizens and organisations that the dismissed individual no longer has any affiliation with the armed forces and that anyone interacting with him as if he were still a naval personnel does so at their own risk.
The statement, which was signed by naval authorities but did not specify the spokesperson's name, explained that SMUW Bello M had failed to report for duty for over three and a half years, a period that far exceeds any permissible leave or authorised absence. "The rating was found guilty of desertion from naval service after an absence without official leave for 1346 days," the statement read. The Navy emphasised that such a lengthy and unexplained absence is a fundamental violation of military discipline, which demands not only physical presence but also unwavering commitment to service. Desertion is considered one of the most serious offences in any military establishment, as it undermines unit cohesion, operational readiness, and the trust placed in every service member. The dismissal took effect immediately upon the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, which reportedly followed an investigation into the rating's whereabouts and attempts to locate him.
The case of SMUW Bello M raises several questions about how a serving naval rating could remain absent for nearly four years without being apprehended or declared deserter earlier. Military sources, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to brief the press, indicated that the naval authorities had made repeated efforts to trace the personnel through his last known addresses, family contacts, and even through inter-agency collaboration with the police and other security services. For reasons that have not been disclosed, those efforts were unsuccessful until recently, when information leading to the conclusion of the disciplinary process became available. The Navy has not revealed whether the dismissed individual is currently in custody or whether any further legal action, such as prosecution under the Armed Forces Act, is being contemplated beyond the administrative dismissal.
The Navy’s public warning is significant. By declaring that anyone who interacts with SMUW Bello M as a naval personnel does so at their own risk, the service is effectively disowning any action or representation the individual might make. This is a standard procedure in cases of desertion or dismissal, as it protects the institution from liability for any illegal or unauthorised activities the ex-serviceman might engage in while posing as an active member of the military. The advisory is also directed at employers, business partners, and members of the public who might be deceived by the display of naval identification cards, uniforms, or claims of affiliation. The Navy urged vigilance and called on citizens to report any person falsely presenting themselves as a naval officer or rating.
Desertion in the Nigerian military is governed by the Armed Forces Act, which prescribes penalties ranging from dismissal to imprisonment, depending on the circumstances. In this case, the Navy has opted for administrative dismissal, which strips the individual of all rights, privileges, and entitlements associated with his rank and service. He loses his position, his pay, and his access to military facilities and benefits. It is unclear from the statement whether the dismissal was preceded by a court-martial or a lesser disciplinary proceeding. However, given the length of the absence and the clear evidence of desertion, a summary trial or a board of inquiry could have been convened to establish the facts before the dismissal was finalised.
The case of SMUW Bello M is not entirely unprecedented. In 2022, the Nigerian Army dismissed several soldiers who had been absent for extended periods, though none approached the lengthy 1,346-day mark. In 2024, the Nigerian Air Force similarly declared a number of personnel deserted and struck them off its payroll. The recurrence of such cases points to gaps in manpower management, tracking systems, and perhaps even the motivation of some personnel to abandon their posts. Military analysts have suggested that poor welfare, low morale, and the lure of better opportunities in civilian life might contribute to desertion, although the Navy did not speculate on the reasons behind SMUW Bello M’s decision to stay away for so long.
The Navy’s statement did not disclose where the deserter was eventually located or what his activities were during his absence. It also did not specify whether he had made any attempt to return to duty before the dismissal proceedings were concluded. Under military law, a deserter who voluntarily surrenders or returns to his unit may be treated with some leniency, especially if there are extenuating circumstances. However, after 1,346 days, it is unlikely that any mitigating factor would have saved SMUW Bello M from dismissal. The Navy’s decision sends a clear message to all serving personnel: absence without leave will not be tolerated, and desertion will lead to the loss of a military career.
The Nigerian Navy has been undergoing a series of reforms aimed at improving professionalism, discipline, and operational efficiency under the leadership of the current Chief of the Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Emmanuel Ogalla. The service has recently launched several anti-piracy patrols, cracked down on illegal oil bunkering, and invested in new platforms to protect Nigeria’s maritime domain. In this context, the dismissal of a deserter, even one low-ranking rating, is symbolic of the Navy’s commitment to upholding discipline across all ranks. It also serves as a deterrent to others who might consider abandoning their posts.
The public reaction to the announcement has been mixed. Some Nigerians expressed shock that someone could be absent for four years before being formally dismissed, questioning the efficiency of military record-keeping. Others commended the Navy for eventually taking action and warning the public. Still, some voiced concern about the welfare of military personnel, suggesting that desertion might be a symptom of deeper issues such as poor remuneration, lack of promotion prospects, or inadequate healthcare for families. The Navy did not respond to those concerns in its statement, focusing instead on the disciplinary aspect.
For SMUW Bello M, the future is uncertain. Having been dismissed from service, he loses all entitlements and may also be barred from future public service employment. In some cases, desertion can also lead to criminal prosecution, though the Navy did not indicate whether it would pursue that course. If he was not in custody at the time of dismissal, he remains at large, albeit without any military backing. The Navy’s warning to the public means that any person or organisation that deals with him as if he were still a naval rating does so at their own risk, exposing themselves to potential fraud or deception.
As the Nigerian Navy continues to enforce discipline within its ranks, the case of SMUW Bello M will likely be studied in military training institutions as a cautionary tale. It highlights the importance of accountability, the consequences of abandoning one’s duty, and the need for robust systems to track personnel. For the ordinary citizen, the lesson is simple: verify the credentials of anyone claiming to be a military officer, especially if they are offering services, demanding favours, or asking for money. The Navy has spoken, and the deserter has been cast out. Whether the system that allowed him to remain absent for years will also be scrutinised remains to be seen.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments