Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The Federal High Court in Dutse, Jigawa State, has ordered the Department of State Services to immediately release a 16-year-old girl, Walida Abdulhadi, and hand over a DSS operative, Ifeanyi Onyewuenyi, to the police for investigation over allegations of sexual abuse and unlawful detention that have drawn widespread public attention.
PUNCH Online gathered that the ruling followed a case involving claims that Abdulhadi, a resident of Hadejia Local Government Area, was abducted in 2023 and allegedly sexually abused by the DSS operative while in his custody, an incident that later resulted in the birth of a baby girl and triggered legal proceedings across different courts in Jigawa State.
Delivering judgment, Justice Hassan Dikko directed the DSS to release the girl unconditionally, stressing that any attempt to continue holding her was unlawful, and ordered that the accused operative be transferred to the Jigawa State Police Command for a thorough and independent investigation in line with criminal procedure.
The judge also criticised the security agency for what he described as shielding its officer from prosecution, stating that the DSS does not have the legal authority to investigate such criminal allegations under its establishing law, and therefore any internal probe previously conducted was invalid.
He ruled that only the police and courts have jurisdiction over such criminal matters, and ordered compliance with existing judicial directives, including an earlier magistrate court order that had also called for the release of the girl to her family and transfer of the suspect for investigation.
Lawyers representing the family of the victim welcomed the decision, describing it as a restoration of confidence in the judiciary and urging security agencies to ensure swift enforcement of the court’s orders to allow proper investigation and accountability in the case.
Attempts by journalists to obtain a response from the DSS legal team immediately after the judgment were unsuccessful, leaving questions over the agency’s next steps in compliance with the court order and the broader implications for inter-agency handling of criminal allegations involving personnel.
The case has intensified public discussion in Nigeria over the conduct of security operatives, the protection of minors, and the boundaries of agency authority in criminal investigations, particularly where allegations involve serious human rights violations and require independent judicial oversight.
Under Nigeria’s security architecture, the Department of State Services is responsible for internal intelligence gathering and counter-espionage, but its powers are defined by law and are subject to judicial oversight, particularly in matters involving criminal allegations that fall within the jurisdiction of the regular police and the courts.
Legal experts often note that conflicts arise when multiple agencies assert investigative control over the same criminal case, especially in sensitive allegations involving state operatives, where questions of accountability, independence, and procedural fairness become central to judicial determinations.
In this case, earlier proceedings at a magistrate court in Hadejia had reportedly directed that the girl be released to her parents and the suspect transferred to the state police command, but the DSS challenged the order at the Federal High Court, seeking to halt its enforcement, which ultimately led to Tuesday’s judgment in Dutse.
For residents of Hadejia and the wider Jigawa communities following the case, the matter has become a deeply emotional subject, with the alleged circumstances of the girl’s ordeal and subsequent childbirth intensifying public concern over child protection systems and institutional accountability in handling abuse complaints.
The Federal High Court’s reasoning emphasised the importance of due process and the separation of powers in criminal investigations, reiterating that no agency is above the law and that any attempt to shield a suspect from proper investigation undermines public trust in the justice system.
Across Nigeria, similar cases involving allegations against security personnel have frequently sparked debate over institutional transparency, with civil society organisations repeatedly calling for independent mechanisms to handle complaints involving law enforcement or intelligence operatives to ensure impartial investigations.
Authorities are now expected to move toward implementing the court’s directives, including the physical transfer of the accused operative to the police for questioning, while ensuring the immediate release and safe return of the girl to her family under protective conditions.
The judgment also reinforces ongoing debates about institutional reform within Nigeria’s security agencies, particularly the need to strengthen external oversight, improve inter-agency coordination, and ensure that allegations involving vulnerable individuals are handled with transparency and urgency.
As of the time of reporting, neither the Department of State Services nor its legal representatives had issued an official public statement addressing the court’s decision, leaving the next steps uncertain pending formal compliance or possible further legal action.
Observers say the case will likely serve as a reference point in future disputes involving jurisdictional authority between security agencies and the police, especially in matters where allegations of abuse or misconduct require swift and independent investigation.
For now, attention remains focused on compliance with the court order, the welfare of the released minor, and the outcome of the investigation into the alleged actions of the DSS operative, which continues to draw public scrutiny across the country.
The case has also highlighted the emotional and legal complexities surrounding custodial responsibility when minors are involved in criminal investigations, particularly where allegations intersect with state institutions entrusted with public security. Legal practitioners say such matters often test the resilience of judicial independence and the capacity of enforcement agencies to adhere strictly to court orders without delay or internal obstruction. In communities where trust in institutions is already fragile, outcomes of cases like this can significantly influence public perception of fairness and accountability in the justice system. Stakeholders continue to emphasise the importance of timely prosecution, victim protection, and transparent communication from authorities to prevent misinformation and reduce anxiety among affected families. As the situation develops, attention remains fixed on whether the directives of the Federal High Court will be implemented in full and whether further investigations will proceed without institutional interference, ensuring that all parties involved are subject to the rule of law.
Public interest in the case remains high as legal proceedings continue in the background.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments