Reported by: Oahimire Omone Precious | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
Human rights lawyers and civil society organisations have condemned the arrest of a well‑known social media influencer, Justice Mark Chidiebere, popularly called Justice Crack, by the Nigerian Army. The army announced on Sunday, 3 May 2026, that it had interrogated Chidiebere and a number of soldiers after the blogger published posts discussing soldiers’ grievances over feeding and welfare. In a statement signed by the Acting Director of Army Public Relations, Colonel Appolonia Anele, the military alleged that Chidiebere “seemed to be inciting soldiers to create discontent” and that he engaged in chats “bordering on subversion.” The army handed him over to unspecified “relevant civil authorities” for prosecution.
The army’s statement did not provide specific evidence of subversion or incitement. It acknowledged that the soldiers had discussed “a wide range of issues” with Chidiebere, but it characterised his conduct as an attempt to “cultivate vulnerable personnel towards acts of subversion.” The military also confirmed that the soldiers involved remain in its custody while Chidiebere is now facing civil prosecution. The army defended its action as part of its commitment to the rule of law and the safeguarding of national sovereignty.
The arrest has drawn sharp criticism from free speech advocates and legal experts who argue that the military is overstepping its bounds by prosecuting a civilian for speaking to soldiers about their welfare. “A blogger who amplifies the voices of disgruntled soldiers is not a subversive; he is a journalist,” said human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong. “The army has no business detaining a civilian for discussing working conditions that the soldiers themselves invited him to hear.” The Nigerian Army has a history of clamping down on critics. In 2022, the military threatened to arrest and prosecute Anyim Nyerere, a journalist who wrote about soldiers refusing to go to the front line due to poor equipment.
Section 113 of the Armed Forces Act criminalises “subversion,” but legal experts say the provision is vaguely worded and has been used to silence legitimate criticism. The International Centre for Investigative Reporting noted in a 2020 report that the Nigerian military has repeatedly invoked subversion to detain journalists and activists. “There is no evidence that Chidiebere attempted to overthrow the government or incite mutiny. He simply published what soldiers told him,” said Lagos‑based lawyer Jide Ogunbiyi. “If that is a crime, then every journalist who has ever reported on military discontent is guilty.”
The army’s statement did not specify which civilian authority now holds Chidiebere or what charges he faces. The Department of State Services (DSS) and the Nigeria Police Force have both prosecuted civilians for alleged subversion in the past. In 2021, the DSS detained a university lecturer, Dr. Onyinyechi Igwegbe, for allegedly sharing “inciting” material online. She was released after public outcry. Similarly, in 2023, the police arrested a Twitter user for calling for a “revolution.” The user was released on bail after a court ruling that his tweets, however provocative, did not constitute an imminent threat to public order.
The army’s justification for the arrest raises troubling questions about the right of soldiers to speak to journalists. Under Nigerian law, serving personnel are subject to military discipline and are generally prohibited from speaking to the media without authorisation. However, the army’s decision to detain a civilian for facilitating that speech suggests an effort to silence anyone who amplifies military dissent. This is not the first time the military has taken action against civilians who communicate with soldiers. In 2019, a civilian contractor was detained for allegedly supplying banned items to soldiers. The case was later dropped.
The incident also highlights the poor state of soldiers’ welfare. The very discussions that led to Chidiebere’s arrest were about feeding and other welfare issues. Rather than addressing the substance of the soldiers’ complaints, the army has chosen to detain the person who publicised them. This strategy, critics say, will only drive soldier grievances further underground and worsen morale.
Chidiebere’s family has since called for his release. His lawyer, who asked not to be named, said he had not been allowed access to his client. “He was transferred from army custody to another agency. As of Sunday evening, we do not know where he is being held or what exactly he is accused of,” the lawyer said. The army’s refusal to disclose the specific charges has led to speculation that it has no solid legal basis for the detention. The National Human Rights Commission has not issued a statement on the matter as of press time.
In 2024, a Federal High Court in Abuja awarded damages to a journalist who was detained by the military for three months on trumped‑up subversion charges. The court held that the military had no power to detain a civilian without charge. Chidiebere’s case may follow a similar pattern. But even if he is eventually released, the chilling effect on civil‑military discourse will remain. The message from the army is clear: speaking to soldiers about their welfare could land you in jail.
As the 2027 general elections approach, the military’s sensitivity to any criticism is likely to increase. The army’s intervention in politics has a long history in Nigeria, and officers have in recent years been accused of overstepping their constitutional role. The detention of a blogger for discussing soldiers’ feeding suggests that the military is expanding its surveillance of civilian society. Whether the civil authorities will prosecute Chidiebere or drop the case remains to be seen. What is clear is that the army’s action has once again raised questions about the limits of free speech in a country with a long and painful history of military rule.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments