Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
A major crack has emerged within Nigeria’s opposition bloc after the camp of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar issued a sharp warning to opposition parties, cautioning them against zoning the 2027 presidential ticket exclusively to the South. In a statement issued on Monday, May 11, 2026, by Atiku’s media aide, Olusola Sanni, the former vice president’s camp argued that such a move would be politically self‑defeating and could hand President Bola Ahmed Tinubu an easy path to re‑election.
The warning came just days after the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), one of the fastest‑growing opposition parties, formally zoned its presidential ticket to Southern Nigeria for a single four‑year term. The resolution, adopted at the party’s national convention in Abuja on Saturday, May 9, was moved by Afam Victor Ogene, a House of Representatives member from Anambra State, and overwhelmingly endorsed by delegates. The decision was widely seen as a strategic move to position former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, who recently joined the NDC alongside former Kano State Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso, as the party’s leading presidential hopeful.
Atiku’s camp rejected the logic behind the zoning proposal, insisting that electoral arithmetic, not emotion, should guide opposition strategy. “The first and most obvious question is this: how does a Southern opposition candidate realistically unseat a sitting Southern president?” the statement read. “Nigerian political history offers no precedent for such an outcome. No incumbent president has ever been defeated by an opposition challenger from the same geopolitical bloc. To insist otherwise is to enter the contest already defeated.”
The statement argued that while the ruling All Progressives Congress may understandably retain its southern presidential configuration around President Tinubu, it would amount to political naivety for the opposition to adopt the same logic without a sober assessment of electoral realities. “Defeating an incumbent president requires realism, not romanticism; strategy, not sentiment; honesty, not selective memory. The opposition must decide whether its goal is to make an emotional statement or to actually win power,” the statement warned.
Atiku’s camp also questioned the moral argument behind southern zoning, noting that by 2027, the South would have held presidential power for approximately 18 years in the Fourth Republic, compared to about ten years for the North. “If the South retains power for another four years, that disparity widens even further. It therefore becomes difficult to understand the justice in an argument that seeks to deepen an already existing imbalance under the guise of equity,” the statement said. The camp further accused some political actors of selective memory, pointing to those who supported a Southern presidency under Goodluck Jonathan in 2011 despite expectations that power should return to the North following the death of President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. “It is intellectually dishonest for those who enthusiastically supported a Southern presidency under Goodluck Jonathan in 2011, despite the North’s legitimate expectation under the informal zoning arrangement, to now suddenly posture as custodians of rotational justice. Principles do not become sacred only when they align with personal ambition,” the statement added.
While acknowledging the Southeast’s legitimate aspiration to produce a president, Atiku’s camp warned against reducing that aspiration to what it called “transactional political bargaining.” “The Southeast deserves a sustainable and credible pathway to national leadership — not symbolic tokenism or bespoke arrangements tailored to satisfy one individual’s ambition,” the statement said. The camp urged opposition forces to focus on building a broad national coalition capable of defeating Tinubu in 2027, rather than embracing what it described as a self‑defeating zoning narrative.
The NDC’s zoning decision has generated intense reactions across the political spectrum. At the party’s convention, Kwankwaso expressed full support for the zoning arrangement, stating, “I support the decision to zone the presidential ticket to the South so that the region can complete its eight years. This is in line with the zoning process and party agreement.” Senator Victor Umeh, representing Anambra Central, also defended the decision, describing it as a strategic step aimed at preserving national unity and political balance. Addressing delegates, Obi declared that the movement was focused on lifting Nigeria out of poverty, insecurity and leadership failure. “We are not changing political platforms for transactional reasons. We are making a principled decision to find a platform that gives us the opportunity to build a new Nigeria that is possible,” he stated.
However, the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, has launched a stinging attack on the NDC’s zoning plan, dismissing it as “political 419” designed to deceive Nigerians. In a statement on Monday, Keyamo argued that the arrangement was a hollow political gimmick and also reiterated that former President Goodluck Jonathan is constitutionally ineligible to contest the 2027 election, a position that added another layer of controversy to the ongoing political realignments.
The widening rift over zoning has exposed deep divisions within Nigeria’s opposition bloc. The grand opposition project assembled under the African Democratic Congress (ADC), which was meant to be a formidable, unified front capable of unseating Tinubu, has crumbled following the defections of Obi and Kwankwaso to the NDC. The ADC coalition had also faced internal disputes over the zoning of the presidential ticket, with some factions pushing for a southern candidate and others insisting that the North must be allowed to complete its eight‑year cycle. The collapse of the ADC coalition has left Atiku increasingly isolated, though his associates insist that the broader opposition alliance remains intact.
Political analysts have noted that the zoning debate is not merely about regional representation but also about the personal ambitions of key political figures. Atiku, who hails from Adamawa State in the North‑East, has contested for the presidency multiple times since Nigeria’s return to democratic rule. His camp’s insistence that competence and national unity should take precedence over regional considerations is seen by some as a veiled argument for his own candidacy. Conversely, the NDC’s southern zoning arrangement is widely interpreted as a pathway for Peter Obi, who would become the party’s natural standard‑bearer under the new framework.
As consultations and coalition talks continue ahead of the 2027 elections, the opposition faces a fundamental choice: whether to prioritise regional balancing or to field a candidate with the strongest electoral appeal. Atiku’s camp has made its position clear, warning that sentiment must not override strategy. The NDC and its southern aspirants, however, appear determined to press forward with their zoning plan, betting that a southern opposition candidate can break the historical precedent and unseat a sitting president from the same region. The outcome of this debate will profoundly shape the 2027 presidential election and determine whether the opposition can present a united front against the APC.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments