UK Govt Gives Apple And Google Three Months To Block Nude Images For Children

Published on 8 June 2026 at 16:20

Published by Oravbiere Osayomore Promise. 

LONDON – The United Kingdom has issued a high‑stakes ultimatum to the world’s largest technology firms: within three months, Apple and Google must make it impossible for children to take, share or view nude images on their smartphones and tablets, or face legislation that could include fines of up to 10 percent of global revenue, blocked services, and even prison time for tech bosses. The demand, announced on June 8, 2026, positions Britain as the first country to seek nationwide protections of this kind.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer delivered the warning in a keynote speech at London Tech Week, declaring that “tech should adapt to the needs of society, not the other way around”.“For too long, people have been told that is simply the price of modern tech, that nothing can be done, that government is powerless, that parents just have to accept it,” Starmer said. “I reject that completely.” He gave the companies a September 2026 deadline. “If they choose not to, then we will act and we will change the law, because when it comes to the safety of our children, standing by is not an option.”

The government said that if the firms do not voluntarily activate or build safety features, it will bring forward legislation to force compliance. That law would impose fines and, as a “last resort”, explore criminal liability for tech executives who fail to comply – a step modelled on the Online Safety Act 2023, which already carries sentences of up to five years in prison. A separate measure gives firms 48 hours to remove flagged non‑consensual intimate images or face penalties of up to 10 percent of global revenue or service blocking in the UK.

The Home Office said the push responds to the stark reality of online harm. It cited data showing that 91 percent of online child sexual abuse reports recorded in 2024 contained “self‑generated” content from children themselves, and that the average child now views pornography by the age of 13.

Under the plan, adults would still be able to access nude content after verifying their age. But for anyone under 18, the technical expectation is total blocking: devices must detect and block explicit images in messages, search functions and the camera itself. Currently, Apple applies nudity detection only to iMessage, not to third‑party apps like Snapchat nor to the camera. Google offers blurring and warnings on some Android devices, but the government wants those protections extended and made universal.

In response, Google said it was “deeply committed to protecting children online” and was “working constructively with UK partners to find effective, privacy‑preserving solutions”. Apple, which recently rolled out age verification for UK users, already offers a block on its own platforms, but officials noted that the current features do not prevent a child from taking a nude photo with the camera itself.

Child safety campaigners welcomed the move as long‑overdue. Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, called it “an important step forward for child protection”. Jess Phillips, the Labour MP who resigned as safeguarding minister earlier this year accusing Starmer of being slow to act, expressed “relief that this has finally happened”. She noted that “the tech exists to make this happen, it should not take long for companies to stop nude images of children being made fast.”

Yet the plan has drawn sharp criticism from civil liberties groups, who warn of sweeping surveillance risks. Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch, said the proposals were “outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm”. She called them “performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult‑registered devices”, adding: “The government mandating that all phones in Britain require ID and verification in its operating system would invoke the death of anonymity and internet privacy.”

The Home Office has rejected that characterisation. “Some claim this to be an invasion of privacy – but it isn’t,” it said in a statement. Officials stressed that the technology would target only content detection, not general surveillance of users.

The three‑month clock now runs. If Apple and Google do not meet the deadline, Britain will become the first country to legislate for universal, operating‑system‑level blocking of nude images on children’s devices – a precedent that other governments are likely to watch closely.

📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com ✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.