Published by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
Nigeria’s African Democratic Congress has fixed May 12, 2026, for the formal inauguration of its newly elected state executives and chairmen, a move that comes against the backdrop of an unresolved leadership dispute and regulatory challenges involving the electoral body.
The announcement was made on Sunday by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, who confirmed that the inauguration would proceed as scheduled or on a later date to be communicated by the National Working Committee. The development follows the conduct of state congresses in several parts of the country, including Osun and Anambra states, despite ongoing internal tensions within the party.
In his statement, Abdullahi congratulated those elected during the congresses, describing the exercise as consistent with the party’s constitution and relevant legal provisions. He maintained that the process reflected the ADC’s commitment to internal democracy, transparency, and adherence to the rule of law, even as questions persist about the legitimacy of its current leadership structure.
“These elections reflect the party’s enduring commitment to democratic principles,” he said, adding that party members and stakeholders had demonstrated maturity and discipline during the exercise.
The party also used the occasion to urge the newly elected officials to remain committed to its ideals as they prepare to assume office. Abdullahi emphasized that the responsibilities ahead would require unity, discipline, and a sustained effort to position the ADC as a credible political alternative in Nigeria’s evolving political landscape.
He expressed confidence that the emergence of new leadership at the state level would strengthen the party’s grassroots structures and deepen its engagement with citizens across the federation, particularly as political activities gradually intensify ahead of future electoral cycles.
However, the announcement comes amid a deepening crisis within the party, largely triggered by a decision of the Independent National Electoral Commission to derecognise the National Working Committee led by former Senate President David Mark. The electoral body took the position following a ruling of the Court of Appeal, which directed all parties involved in the dispute to maintain the status quo pending the determination of a substantive suit before the Federal High Court.
INEC subsequently stated that it would not monitor or participate in any congresses or conventions conducted by the party until the legal issues are resolved. This position raised significant concerns about the validity of any internal electoral processes carried out in the interim period.
Despite this directive, the ADC proceeded with its state congresses as scheduled, a decision that has further exposed divisions within the party. The situation has led to the emergence of factional groups, each laying claim to legitimacy and authority within the party’s hierarchy.
The internal dispute has also resulted in the suspension of congresses and related activities in at least six states, reflecting the uneven implementation of party decisions across the country. Political observers say the conflicting developments highlight the challenges facing smaller political parties in maintaining cohesion and institutional stability.
Legal analysts note that the outcome of the pending case before the Federal High Court will be crucial in determining the future direction of the party. Until then, questions are likely to persist regarding the recognition of party officials and the legality of decisions taken by any faction.
The ADC, which has positioned itself as an alternative platform in Nigeria’s multi-party system, has in recent years struggled with internal disagreements that have occasionally affected its organizational effectiveness. The current crisis is seen as one of the most significant tests of its resilience and capacity to manage internal conflicts.
Party insiders suggest that the decision to proceed with the congresses and announce an inauguration date may be part of a broader strategy to assert control and maintain momentum, despite the uncertainties surrounding its leadership status. However, critics argue that such actions could complicate the legal situation and further deepen divisions within the party.
The unfolding developments also raise broader questions about party governance, electoral oversight, and the enforcement of regulatory decisions in Nigeria’s political system. Analysts warn that prolonged disputes of this nature can weaken party structures and reduce public confidence in political institutions.
For now, attention is focused on whether the planned inauguration will proceed as announced and how the electoral commission and the courts will respond to the party’s actions. The coming weeks are expected to be critical in shaping the trajectory of the ADC and determining the legitimacy of its newly elected officials.
As the situation evolves, stakeholders within and outside the party continue to call for dialogue, legal clarity, and adherence to due process as essential steps toward resolving the crisis and restoring stability.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments