Ibadan Obas: Chieftaincy Can’t Bar Anyone From Contesting Election, Lawyer Says

Published on 3 April 2026 at 12:27

Published by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.

In Ibadan, Oyo State, a constitutional dispute over the intersection of traditional chieftaincy and political rights has gained fresh attention after a senior lawyer clarified that holding or being eligible for a traditional title cannot legally prevent a Nigerian citizen from pursuing public office. The explanation comes amid controversy surrounding the planned coronation of three high chiefs as crowned Obas — a development that has drawn both cultural interest and political debate as Nigeria approaches major elections.

Adebisi Adeyemo, a constitutional lawyer based in Ibadan, stated unequivocally that the Nigerian Constitution is the supreme authority on who may contest elections and that no traditional title, whether held or merely eligible for, can be used as a basis to bar anyone from standing for elective office. He made these remarks against the backdrop of discussions around the elevation and coronation of high chiefs who are also influential in public life, particularly Senator Sharafadeen Abiodun Alli.

Adeyemo emphasised that the Constitution’s clear provisions on political participation must override customary or informal expectations tied to chieftaincy systems. He noted that Sections 65 and 106 of the Constitution preserve the right of qualified citizens to contest elections, while Sections 66 and 107 list disqualification criteria, none of which mention chieftaincy status or eligibility as a disqualifier. Drawing on past examples, he explained that prominent figures in Nigeria’s history have held traditional titles and still participated actively in politics — including serving in executive positions — without constitutional conflict.

The legal clarification comes as the Oyo State Government under Governor Seyi Makinde prepared to formally present the Staff of Office to three newly elevated crown‑wearing Obas in Ibadanland. The coronation, initially billed for April 3 at the historic Mapo Hall in Ibadan, was meant to mark the promotion of high chiefs Akeem Mobolaji Adewoyin, Oyekola Babalola, and Sarafadeen Abiodun Alli to crowned Oba status — ranks that place them high within the traditional hierarchy of Ibadanland.

The state’s announcement of the coronation highlighted Makinde’s broader efforts to strengthen traditional institutions and preserve cultural heritage, noting that his administration has installed numerous kings and Baales across Oyo State. The ceremony was expected to attract dignitaries from across the country, including traditional rulers, government officials, and community leaders.

However, the coronation plan has encountered complications. Sources close to the traditional council indicated that the three high chiefs had informed the Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Rashidi Ladoja, that they would be unavailable for the ceremony, with reasons ranging from national assignments to medical commitments abroad. Reports suggested that no preparations were underway at family compounds for the planned event, and some insiders implied dissatisfaction with the short notice given by the state government.

The Olubadan Palace subsequently issued a statement dismissing rumours of a rift between the monarch and the governor, affirming that Oba Ladoja remained in Ibadan and that there was no conflict. The palace reiterated that the chiefs had communicated their unavailability and requested a postponement, which was conveyed to the state government through the Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters.

The controversy has drawn broader attention partly because of Senator Alli’s political profile. Alli, a seasoned lawyer and legislator representing Oyo South Senatorial District, has been discussed in political circles in connection with potential ambitions for higher office in the 2027 general elections. Some observers have interpreted the elevation to traditional status as politically symbolic, raising questions about how such roles interact with modern political engagement.

Despite these debates, constitutional experts like Adeyemo stress that cultural titles carry social importance but do not possess legal force to restrict fundamental political rights. He clarified that eligibility for a throne is not itself a binding obligation, and that even formally installed traditional rulers are entitled to political rights unless expressly disqualified under the Constitution. Adeyemo cautioned against using misinterpretations of customary practices to generate tension or exclusion, urging respect for constitutional guarantees and lawful political conduct.

The situation reflects broader questions in Nigeria’s evolving democratic context about the role of traditional leadership in modern governance. While traditional rulers often play influential roles in community life and can lend legitimacy to public initiatives, their positions are rooted in culture and custom rather than statutory authority. As such, any perceived overlap with political rights must be carefully navigated within constitutional boundaries.

Critics of the coronation’s timing and process argue that ethical expectations of traditional leadership — especially the neutrality traditionally expected of monarchs — could complicate public perception if titleholders pursue elective office. They contend that even where there is no legal restriction, the symbolic power of traditional roles carries community expectations that may influence political dynamics. Yet legal authorities maintain that constitutional rights remain paramount and that citizens should not be deterred from participating in elective politics based on chieftaincy associations.

As discussions around chieftaincy, cultural heritage, and political engagement continue, the principal takeaway from legal perspectives is that the Constitution upholds the right of qualified citizens to seek political office without discrimination based on cultural titles. For now, stakeholders in Ibadanland and Oyo State appear to be balancing respect for tradition with adherence to constitutional rights as the state’s political and cultural landscape evolves.

📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.