Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The killing of 16-year-old Sesugh Michael Atser has ignited a firestorm of outrage against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), with the boy's family and human rights lawyers branding the agency's account of a deadly gun battle as a fabricated cover-up for an extrajudicial execution. The conflicting versions of events have exposed deep public mistrust in Nigeria's security apparatus and raised urgent constitutional questions about the use of lethal force against unarmed citizens.
The teenager, a JSS3 student and furniture-making apprentice, was killed on 23 May 2026 in the Kanshio area of Makurdi, Benue State. In its official account, the EFCC claimed that Atser was one of three suspects who escaped from its Makurdi holding facility on 4 May 2026 after using a toilet break to break through the roof. The commission stated that after intelligence placed the fugitives in the Kanshio area, its operatives moved in to re-arrest them on 21 May. When the suspects opened fire, the EFCC said, its officers returned fire in self-defence. During the exchange, Sesugh was found wounded by the roadside and later died in hospital. The EFCC maintains he "did not die in custody and was not on bail at any time".
The victim's mother, Jennifer Atsar, a 35-year-old single mother of five who sells garri for a living, has delivered a devastating rebuttal of the official narrative. She insisted that her son had been arrested weeks earlier but released on bail, with EFCC operatives unlawfully retaining his mobile phone and demanding a N100,000 bribe for its return. On the day of the killing, she claimed her son was lured to a hotel with a friend, where two plainclothes EFCC officers were waiting. When they saw the officers draw a gun, they fled. Her son was chased and shot at close range. "My son was a good boy," she said, fighting back tears. "He was not a cultist. He worked at building sites to support me and was learning furniture making".
The family's account has drawn support from witnesses and the victim's apprenticeship master, who described the boy as honest and hardworking. Human rights lawyer Marshal Abubakar has demanded an independent investigation, noting the contradictory accounts from the EFCC, police, witnesses and the family. "The brutal murder of a 16-year-old and labelling such a child a cultist is grossly suspicious and most unacceptable," Abubakar said.
The killing also raises fundamental constitutional questions. The Punch newspaper editorial board argued that "even if every allegation against the teenager were true, a fundamental question remains unanswered: What law authorised the EFCC to kill him?". Nigeria's Constitution guarantees the right to life, and every suspect is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The editorial concluded that "when state agents begin deciding who deserves to live or die, the rule of law collapses into the rule of force".
The Nigeria Police Force has opened an investigation into the incident, but the family says it has been denied access to the boy's body and has still not seen his corpse. As public outrage grows, the case has become a stark test of whether Nigeria's security institutions can be held accountable for the use of lethal force against citizens and whether the rule of law will prevail over the rule of trigger.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com ✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments