Abandoned or On Duty? Police Fire Back at Neglect Allegations After Osun Election

Published on 4 September 2026 at 21:26

Published by Osasere Edomwonyi Ikpoba


The Nigeria Police Force has found itself at the centre of a heated public controversy, vehemently denying allegations that hundreds of its personnel deployed for the August 15 governorship election in Osun State have been abandoned in the state weeks after the polls closed. In a forceful statement issued on Friday, the police leadership pushed back against what it described as misleading reports of institutional neglect, insisting that the continued presence of its officers in Osun is a standard post-election security procedure rather than a logistical failure.

The controversy erupted following reports that officers drawn from as many as 50 Police Mobile Force squadrons were still stationed in Osun under harsh conditions, with inadequate food and basic welfare provisions, long after their election duties had ended. The allegations, which first surfaced in a report by Sahara Reporters, painted a grim picture of officers camped in difficult conditions across locations including Gbongan, with little operational activity and dwindling supplies.

The Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Anietie Iniedu, moved swiftly to counter the narrative. In a statement issued on Friday, September 4, 2026, Iniedu clarified that the continued deployment of personnel in Osun follows established post-election deployment procedures designed to sustain security, prevent post-election violence, address emerging threats, and ensure a smooth transition to normal policing. “The duration of deployment is determined by operational and security needs,” the statement read, firmly rejecting claims that officers had been abandoned or subjected to inadequate welfare.

The police spokesperson stressed that all officers deployed for the election had received their approved entitlements, and that command structures remained responsible for their welfare throughout the assignment. “Portraying a planned post-election security deployment as institutional neglect is misleading,” Iniedu said. “Such reporting misrepresents operational realities and may undermine personnel morale and public confidence in the Force.”

The denial comes against the backdrop of one of the most heavily secured off-cycle polls in recent Nigerian history. The Nigeria Police Force had deployed more than 15,000 personnel for the Osun election, including units of the Police Mobile Force in each of the state's 30 local government areas, along with commissioners of police, a Deputy Inspector-General of Police coordinating operations, and aerial surveillance assets. Additional personnel from the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and other agencies brought the overall security presence even higher.

The election itself was fiercely contested, with incumbent Governor Ademola Adeleke of the Accord Party securing re-election with 511,067 votes, defeating his closest challenger, Bola Oyebamiji of the All Progressives Congress, who polled 444,815 votes. Adeleke won in 19 local government areas while Oyebamiji took 11. A total of 1,010,684 voters were accredited, with 985,079 valid votes recorded. However, the electoral process was marred by significant violence. Reports indicate that at least 34 election-related violent incidents and 18 deaths were recorded in Osun from May 2026, with the Accord Party alleging coordinated attacks on its members and claiming 15 of its supporters were killed.

It was against this volatile backdrop that the police decided to maintain a significant presence in the state. The Force had publicly confirmed days after the poll that election-deployed officers remained on the ground as part of a post-election security plan that also included anti-riot units and undercover operatives at strategic locations. The decision was made to prevent a resurgence of violence and to respond to any emerging threats during the post-election transition period.

However, the allegations of neglect were given a powerful public platform when Afrobeats superstar Davido, who is also the nephew of Governor Adeleke, mocked the police on social media. In a post on his verified X handle, Davido questioned whether the continued presence of the officers was due to a failure to secure the desired electoral outcome. “Could it be because dem no deliver?” he tweeted, directly challenging the police narrative and amplifying the public's growing scepticism.

The controversy has also raised questions about the welfare of security personnel across the country. Sources within the Nigeria Police Force told Sahara Reporters that officers drawn from as many as 50 Police Mobile Force squadrons and deployed to different parts of Osun for the election had yet to return to their regular formations. According to the sources, some of the officers were being kept in camps under difficult conditions, with inadequate food and other basic welfare provisions. These accounts have fuelled public concern about the treatment of officers who put their lives on the line to secure electoral processes.

The police have, however, remained resolute in their defence. They have urged media organisations to verify claims, particularly those attributed to unnamed sources, before publishing reports that could mislead the public or undermine security operations. “The Nigeria Police Force remains committed to personnel welfare and will continue to deploy officers strategically wherever needed to protect lives, property, and public peace,” the statement concluded.

The latest denial also comes as the state adjusts to the election outcome and the police leadership in Osun undergoes further changes. The Force maintains that the residual presence of officers is a deliberate operational decision, not a failure of logistics or welfare. Yet, the public perception of neglect, fuelled by social media commentary and anonymous sources, continues to cast a shadow over the police's post-election strategy.

As the debate rages on, the fundamental question remains: is the continued deployment of officers a prudent security measure or a symptom of institutional failure? The police have made their position clear. But for the officers still stationed in Osun, the conditions on the ground will ultimately determine whether the public's concerns are justified. For now, the Force's message is one of operational necessity, not abandonment. Whether that message will be accepted by a sceptical public remains to be seen.

📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.