An Ekiti State High Court has sentenced two men to death by hanging after convicting them for the kidnapping of a staff member of the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), in a judgment that concluded a criminal case that began more than four years ago.
The judgment was delivered on June 25, 2026, at the High Court in Ado-Ekiti by the Chief Judge of Ekiti State, Justice Lekan Ogunmoye. The case involved Ibrahim Abubakar, Abdullahi Abubakar and Usman Abubakar, who were prosecuted following the abduction of NYSC staff member Omoboade Adesina on April 22, 2022.
Justice Ogunmoye found Ibrahim Abubakar and Abdullahi Abubakar guilty of the offence and sentenced both men to death by hanging after concluding that the prosecution had established their involvement in the crime beyond reasonable doubt.
The court, however, reached a different conclusion regarding the third defendant, Usman Abubakar. After reviewing the evidence presented throughout the proceedings, the judge ruled that the prosecution had not sufficiently linked him to the kidnapping and consequently discharged and acquitted him.
The prosecution was conducted by the Department of State Services (DSS), which investigated the case following the abduction of the victim in Ekiti State. The agency subsequently arrested the suspects and initiated legal proceedings against them.
Court proceedings showed that the matter stemmed from the kidnapping of Omoboade Adesina, an employee of the National Youth Service Corps, whose abduction triggered an extensive investigation by security operatives.
The case attracted considerable attention because it involved the abduction of a public servant and formed part of a wider effort by security agencies to combat kidnapping networks operating across parts of the country.
During the trial, prosecutors sought to establish the specific roles allegedly played by each of the accused persons in the commission of the offence. The court examined documentary evidence, witness testimony and investigative findings presented during the proceedings.
A major aspect of the prosecution's case centred on the identification of the suspects. According to the court, an identification parade conducted during the investigation played a significant role in connecting the convicted men to the crime.
Justice Ogunmoye specifically referenced the identification process while delivering his judgment, indicating that it formed part of the evidence relied upon by the court in reaching its decision.
The court also attached substantial weight to telecommunications evidence presented during the trial. Investigators analysed call data records as part of efforts to reconstruct events and establish communication patterns relevant to the case.
According to the judgment, the call data evidence provided important support for the prosecution's arguments and strengthened the overall case against the convicted defendants.
Justice Ogunmoye stated that the combined effect of the evidence presented before the court established the guilt of the two convicted men beyond reasonable doubt.
The court's decision marked the culmination of a legal process that had spanned several years, beginning with the victim's abduction in April 2022 and ending with the delivery of judgment in June 2026.
The length of the proceedings reflected the complexity of criminal prosecutions involving serious offences such as kidnapping, where courts are required to carefully assess all evidence before reaching a verdict.
Throughout the trial, prosecutors worked to demonstrate that the accused persons participated in the planning and execution of the kidnapping operation.
Defence lawyers, on the other hand, challenged aspects of the prosecution's evidence and sought to raise doubts regarding the allegations against their clients.
In criminal proceedings, the burden rests entirely on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, a standard regarded as one of the highest thresholds in law.
Justice Ogunmoye's judgment indicated that this threshold had been met in relation to Ibrahim Abubakar and Abdullahi Abubakar but not in relation to Usman Abubakar.
The acquittal of the third defendant underscored the court's obligation to evaluate the evidence separately against each accused person rather than treating all defendants alike.
Legal analysts often regard such distinctions as an important safeguard within the criminal justice system, ensuring that convictions are based solely on proven evidence.
The judgment also represented a significant outcome for the DSS, which led the investigation and prosecution of the case.
While delivering the verdict, Justice Ogunmoye commended members of the DSS prosecution team for their handling of the matter and for presenting evidence that persuaded the court of the defendants' guilt.
The judge's remarks highlighted the role played by investigators, prosecutors and witnesses throughout the lengthy judicial process.
Kidnapping remains one of Nigeria's most persistent security challenges, with criminal groups frequently targeting individuals for ransom payments.
Over the past decade, federal and state authorities have introduced a range of measures aimed at curbing the crime, including tougher penalties and expanded security operations.
Courts across the country have also continued to impose severe punishments on convicted kidnappers in an effort to reinforce deterrence.
The Ekiti judgment is among several recent kidnapping-related convictions secured through prosecutions conducted by security agencies.
According to reports, the DSS has recently recorded convictions in other cases involving terrorism, kidnapping and related security offences in different parts of the country.
For the victim, Omoboade Adesina, the judgment represents the legal conclusion of a case that began with her abduction more than four years ago.
The case also illustrates the growing reliance on technological evidence, including telecommunications records, in modern criminal investigations.
Such evidence has become increasingly important in helping investigators trace suspects, establish timelines and corroborate witness accounts.
As the proceedings concluded in Ado-Ekiti, the judgment added another chapter to Nigeria's continuing efforts to prosecute and punish those involved in kidnapping and other violent crimes.
The decision of the court means that Ibrahim Abubakar and Abdullahi Abubakar now stand convicted and sentenced to death by hanging, subject to the legal processes available under Nigerian law.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments