Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
Human rights activist and African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, has issued a strong challenge to the federal government, demanding that the same ruthless strategy of demolishing kidnappers' hideouts be applied to the opulent assets of corrupt politicians and public officials. Sowore argued in a statement on Tuesday that the looting of the public treasury is a severe form of kidnapping, one that abducts the hopes and basic necessities of millions of Nigerians, and should therefore be punished with the same severity.
Sowore’s statement, shared on his official X handle, was a direct response to the Oyo State Government’s demolition of a property in Ibadan. The building was identified as a hideout used by the kidnappers who had abducted Mrs. Olaide Busayo Adegoke John-Paul, the sister of former Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, along with her 12-year-old twin sons. The victims were rescued unharmed after a three-day ordeal, leading the state government to pull down the structure less than 48 hours later, citing a zero-tolerance stance against criminality.
“There is no reason why the demolition of houses should be limited only to kidnappers,” Sowore said. He then redirected the principle, arguing that political corruption dwarfs the impact of any single kidnapping ring. “Public treasury looting is a form of kidnapping too; it kidnaps healthcare, education, jobs, infrastructure, and the future of millions of Nigerians,” he declared. Sowore posited that if the government believes that property acquired or used for criminal activity should be destroyed immediately, then the same principle must apply to politicians, public officials, and other powerful individuals who steal public funds to build mansions and acquire vast assets.
The activist framed his demand as a call for a consistent application of the law, questioning the double standard that sees the dwellings of street-level criminals razed while the illicitly acquired assets of politically connected individuals are protected. “If the government truly believes that property acquired through or used for criminal activity should be destroyed immediately, then the same principle must apply to all offenders,” he asserted. Sowore’s remarks resonate with a deep-seated public frustration over selective justice, where high-profile corruption cases often end in plea bargains or are tied up in legal delays for years, even as the properties and assets suspected of being proceeds of such crimes remain untouched.
The demolition in Ibadan, which served as Sowore’s catalyst, was a powerful symbolic act. It was intended to show that the state would not tolerate structures used to perpetrate violence. For Sowore, however, that symbolism is incomplete. He argues that the billions of naira stolen from public accounts and hidden away in mansions and estates causes far more widespread suffering than the actions of any single gang. “Public treasury looting is a form of kidnapping too,” he said, “it kidnaps healthcare, education, jobs, infrastructure, and the future of millions of Nigerians.”
Sowore’s intervention did not just call for demolition; it also spotlighted the political will (or lack thereof) required to fight corruption. He implied that the reason looters’ assets are not demolished is that the occupants of those mansions are often the same people who fund political campaigns and wield influence over security agencies. By calling for their mansions to be razed, he is challenging the ruling class to either live by the same laws they apply to the poor or abandon the policy of property destruction altogether.
His argument has ignited a fresh debate on the anti-corruption war in Nigeria, where government officials have often boasted of record recoveries of assets. However, critics argue that while assets are seized, the prosecution of the accused often stalls, and the assets themselves are frequently not managed transparently. Sowore’s proposal of immediate destruction bypasses this lengthy legal limbo, offering a more visceral form of punishment. But it also raises serious legal and constitutional questions regarding the right to property and the presumption of innocence before a final court judgment.
Whether the government will take his advice is highly unlikely, given the political and legal earthquake it would trigger. However, the argument has successfully shifted the terms of the debate. By equating the kidnapping of a child with the theft of a child's right to education or healthcare, Sowore has tapped into a raw nerve of Nigerian public discourse. For a population that lives daily with the consequences of both violent crime and systemic corruption, his demand for equality before the bulldozer is one that may resonate far beyond the echo chamber of politics.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com ✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments