Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The Presidency has launched a blistering counter-offensive against the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Nigeria (CBCN), accusing its leaders of breaching confidentiality and overstepping their spiritual mandate following Cardinal John Onaiyekan's public disclosure of a private meeting with President Bola Tinubu. In a series of statements issued on Saturday, August 1, 2026, senior presidential aides Temitope Ajayi and Daniel Bwala dismissed the bishops' assessment of the nation's economy and security as incomplete and politically motivated, while sharply criticising Onaiyekan for what they described as an "abuse of clerical privilege."
The controversy erupted after Onaiyekan, the Archbishop Emeritus of Abuja, appeared on Arise Television's 'Prime Time' programme on Friday, July 31, where he revealed details of the closed-door meeting between President Tinubu and the CBCN delegation that had taken place at the State House on July 28. During the interview, the cardinal told viewers that the bishops had presented a memorandum highlighting worsening economic hardship, persistent insecurity, and concerns over the state of Nigeria's democracy, but that President Tinubu rejected their assessment, insisting that his administration was making progress. Onaiyekan quoted the bishops as telling the President that "Nigeria is bleeding" and that the economy was not helping the poor, to which Tinubu reportedly replied that the economy was "doing fine" and that he did not agree with them. The cardinal also expressed concern that too few people within government were willing to tell the President the truth, describing it as one of the country's major challenges, and warned that the administration appeared determined to win the 2027 elections "by all means," raising questions about the credibility of the electoral process.
In a strongly worded opinion piece titled "Cardinal Onaiyekan's Abuse of Clerical Privilege," presidential adviser Temitope Ajayi condemned the cardinal's decision to grant a television interview to offer his own account of the private engagement. "There is something fundamentally inappropriate about Cardinal John Onaiyekan granting a television interview to offer his own account and interpretation of what transpired during the private meeting between the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Nigeria and President Bola Tinubu," Ajayi wrote. "It is, in my view, an abuse of clerical privilege." Ajayi argued that the bishops had requested the audience with the President and presented their concerns, and that Tinubu had listened patiently before responding to each issue raised. He insisted that the President had not been dismissive but had presented evidence to support his argument that the country was not standing still, pointing to restored fiscal stability, improved salary and pension payments, and the foundation laid for economic recovery.
Ajayi also addressed the bishops' call for the return of mission schools, noting that Tinubu had reminded them that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of state governments and that he had personally returned mission schools while serving as Governor of Lagos State. On security, the Presidency rejected the bishops' assessment that Nigeria is bleeding, saying the President acknowledged existing challenges while relying on intelligence and operational reports available to him as Commander-in-Chief. "As Commander-in-Chief, he receives operational briefings, intelligence assessments, and battlefield reports unavailable to the general public," Ajayi wrote, dismissing suggestions that Tinubu depends on external critics to understand the country's realities. He maintained that while the bishops were entitled to present their concerns, the confidentiality of the meeting should have been respected, and that public influence should be exercised with discretion, not by converting privileged access into a platform for post-meeting commentary.
In a separate attack, President Tinubu's Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala, took to his X account to accuse Onaiyekan of being "more political than spiritual." Bwala argued that the cardinal was not speaking for all Christians but for Catholics, and alleged that the Catholic institution had been rooting for Peter Obi, the Labour Party presidential candidate in 2023 and the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) flagbearer for the 2027 elections. "Cardinal Onaiyekan wasn't speaking for Christians; he was speaking for Catholics, the very institutions rooting for Peter Obi, in fact, likely the institution where Peter Obi also said in 2022 'take back your country'," Bwala wrote. "Therefore, the cardinal is more political than spiritual. And not all Catholic members are supporting Peter Obi."
Bwala defended President Tinubu's right to disagree with the bishops' assessment, arguing that the administration's position was backed by "facts, statistics and numbers put into context." He also took a swipe at the cardinal's assessment of the economic situation, saying Catholic priests often encourage their members to make positive confessions even in difficult circumstances. "Ironically, the same priest would rebuke their members if the members said 'we are suffering or we are poor.' They would tell them to rather say 'we are doing great' or 'we are rich' even when they are suffering or poor," Bwala said. He insisted that there is a broader Christian body comprising all denominations, including the Catholic Church, whose position should be neutral and not political.
The heated exchange marks one of the most serious confrontations between the Tinubu administration and the Catholic Church since the President took office in May 2023. The CBCN, one of the most influential religious bodies in Nigeria, has historically used its moral authority to speak on national issues, but its recent intervention has drawn an unusually sharp response from the Presidency, which has sought to frame the bishops' concerns as partisan and their methods as a breach of protocol. The clash also highlights the growing political tensions ahead of the 2027 general elections, with the Catholic Church's perceived leanings toward the opposition becoming a point of contention between the government and the religious hierarchy.
Cardinal Onaiyekan, in his interview, had maintained that the bishops had no political ambitions or personal interests to protect but were compelled by their moral obligation to speak honestly about the suffering of Nigerians. "We are not politicians running for office. We are religious leaders who feel we have a duty—not just to preach our religious doctrines, but also to address the lives of our people," he said. The cardinal also stressed that the document presented to the President reflected the collective position of the Catholic Bishops' Conference after extensive consultations and was not put together at random.
As the war of words continues, the Presidency's accusation that Onaiyekan abused his clerical privilege has drawn mixed reactions from the public, with some defending the cardinal's right to speak truth to power and others criticising him for breaching the confidentiality of a private meeting. The Catholic Church has not issued an official response to the Presidency's statements, but the exchange has underscored the growing friction between the government and religious leaders over the direction of the country and the narrative surrounding its economic and security challenges. For now, the clash between the Presidency and the Catholic bishops stands as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between religious authority and political power in Nigeria's evolving democracy.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments