An Abuja court has ordered Jordan Wike, identified in court reports as a son of Federal Capital Territory Minister Nyesom Wike, to produce his American passport as evidence in an ongoing civil dispute over an alleged $2.1 million land transaction. The order followed Jordan’s testimony that he was outside Nigeria on a date the claimants say money connected with the proposed land deal was handed to him.
Justice Sylvanus Oriji of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama made the order on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, during the resumed hearing of suit CV/008/2026. The case was brought by Safwan Garba GY and GY Global Oil and Gas Nigeria Limited against Jordan Wike. Jordan has denied the allegations made against him, and the court has not determined that the claimants’ account is true.
The passport became an issue during Jordan’s cross-examination after the claimants’ lawyer, Hamza Dantani, questioned him about where he was on September 26, 2025. That date is important because the claimants allege that a substantial cash payment connected with the proposed acquisition of land in Abuja was made around that period. Jordan told the court that he was outside Nigeria.
When Dantani asked what passport he had used for the journey, Jordan said he travelled with his American international passport and indicated that he could produce it if required. The lawyer then formally asked the court to order production of the document. Justice Oriji granted the application and directed Jordan to bring the passport before the court.
The order is significant to the proceedings because the passport could provide documentary evidence concerning Jordan’s international travel and help the court assess his account of his whereabouts at a time relevant to the claimants’ allegations. However, an order to produce a passport is an evidentiary step in an ongoing case and should not be interpreted as a finding of wrongdoing against Jordan.
The dispute centres on allegations concerning land in two prominent areas of Abuja. According to the claimants, they initially met Jordan in London and subsequently developed a relationship with him. They said they later met him in Abuja and approached him for assistance in obtaining land within the Federal Capital Territory.
The claimants allege that Jordan represented that he could facilitate the acquisition of 30 hectares in Katampe and another 30 hectares in Guzape, amounting to 60 hectares altogether. They further allege that $2.1 million was requested as a facilitation fee. According to their account before the court, $2 million of that amount was allegedly described as being for Nyesom Wike, while $100,000 was allegedly Jordan’s own fee. These remain allegations by the claimants and have not been established as facts by the court.
The claimants further allege that money was delivered on September 26, 2025, in the presence of individuals identified in reports as Adamu Sani, Aliyu Sarki and Sai Wani, while Jordan was allegedly accompanied by Onor Sandy. They contend that after the alleged payment, the promised land was not delivered and the money was not returned.
Jordan has rejected the allegations. At Tuesday’s proceedings, he adopted his statement on oath and maintained his defence. He was represented by Senior Advocate of Nigeria Ogwu Onoja, while documents were also tendered through him during the hearing.
During cross-examination, another potentially important evidentiary development occurred when Dantani asked the court to direct Jordan to write his full name five times and provide his signature five times on a plain sheet of paper. The defence did not oppose the request, and Justice Oriji granted it.
Reports of the wider dispute indicate that questions concerning documents and signatures form part of the disagreement between the parties. The handwriting samples taken in open court may therefore be available for comparison with documents being relied upon in the proceedings, although it remains for the court to determine what evidential weight should ultimately be attached to those materials.
The passport issue is particularly important because Jordan’s defence disputes the claimants’ description of events. His evidence that he was outside Nigeria on September 26, 2025 directly challenges an allegation placing him in circumstances connected with the purported payment. Production of his passport could help establish his travel history, although the significance of any entries will depend on the evidence presented to the court and the arguments of both sides.
There are also differences in some published accounts over dates connected with the broader alleged transaction. One report of the underlying filings refers to an October 17, 2025 joint venture arrangement and allegations concerning a cash payment on that date, while the account presented during Tuesday’s cross-examination focused on September 26, 2025. The court proceedings will be important in establishing the relevant chronology rather than treating either version as conclusively established.
The case also requires careful distinction between allegations involving Jordan and references made to his father. Although the claimants allege that most of the disputed $2.1 million was described as money intended for the FCT minister, the material publicly reported from Tuesday’s proceedings does not establish that Nyesom Wike received the money. The allegation remains part of the claimants’ case and should not be treated as a judicial finding.
Jordan’s denial is equally part of the record. According to reports concerning his filed defence, he disputes knowing or transacting with the claimants and challenges documents relied upon against him. Those competing positions are now being tested through testimony, documentary evidence and cross-examination before Justice Oriji.
For the public, the proceedings are notable because they involve the son of the minister responsible for administering the Federal Capital Territory and allegations concerning the acquisition of valuable Abuja land. That public interest, however, does not change the legal position: the allegations remain disputed, and the court must determine the case from admissible evidence rather than the political profile of Jordan’s father.
The passport order therefore does not establish that Jordan received $2.1 million, participated in a fraudulent transaction or made representations attributed to him by the claimants. Its immediate purpose is to require production of a document that could assist the court in examining his testimony concerning his location at a relevant time.
Justice Oriji adjourned the case until Wednesday for continuation of the hearing. Attention will now turn to compliance with the passport order and further evidence from the parties as the court works through the competing accounts surrounding the disputed Abuja land transaction.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments