Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
The High Court of Karnataka has rejected a bail application filed by a 44-year-old Nigerian national, Cristian Soporuchukwu, who was arrested in Bengaluru for allegedly possessing and selling one kilogram of MDMA crystals. The ruling, delivered by Justice V. Srishananda on May 26, 2026, dismissed the petition filed by Soporuchukwu, who had sought release from custody after his trial court plea was also turned down. The court observed that in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotics, denial of bail is the rule and its grant is an exception, particularly when the accused fails to satisfy the strict conditions laid down under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.
According to the prosecution, the Anti‑Narcotic Wing of the Central Crime Branch received a tip‑off on April 5, 2025, about an African national selling MDMA crystals near Begur Lake in Bengaluru. A raid team apprehended Soporuchukwu near a two‑wheeler, where investigators allegedly seized one kilogram of MDMA crystals, a pocket weighing machine, 10 zip‑lock covers, a mobile phone, and the scooter used in the operation. The accused was later arrested and remanded to judicial custody. Soporuchukwu, who had entered India on a business visa, reportedly travelled to Goa, Delhi and Mumbai, where he allegedly established links with drug peddlers of South African origin, purchased MDMA crystals at cheaper rates, and sold them to college students and IT/BT employees for ₹15,000–20,000 per gram.
In his petition before the High Court, Soporuchukwu argued that his arrest was illegal because the “grounds of arrest” were not properly communicated to him, as required under Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution and recent Supreme Court rulings. He sought bail on that technical ground. However, the court disagreed. Justice Srishananda observed that while non‑furnishing of grounds of arrest could justify bail in some cases, such technical lapses cannot be used to secure bail in serious NDPS cases involving commercial quantities of drugs, especially when the accused failed to show that he was not guilty or unlikely to commit further offences. The court noted that the quantity of MDMA seized was commercial, and under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, an accused in such cases must demonstrate reasonable grounds to believe that he is not guilty and that he would not commit any offence while on bail. The court found that Soporuchukwu had not satisfied those conditions.
The court also dismissed the defence’s claim that the drugs could have been planted, observing that procuring one kilogram of MDMA is not easy, making it unlikely that police would falsely implicate the accused. Additionally, the court noted that Soporuchukwu had overstayed his business visa, meaning he was in India illegally. Justice Srishananda stressed that the prosecution had substantially complied with legal requirements regarding the communication of arrest grounds. The court further noted that the accused had informed the remand court that there had been no ill‑treatment and that his arrest had been communicated to a friend. The bail petition was therefore dismissed, and the Nigerian national remains in custody as his trial proceeds.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com
📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News
🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew
📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments