Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El‑Rufai has escalated his legal battle with the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, filing a fresh N10 billion fundamental rights suit against the anti‑graft agency over what he describes as a deliberate and unlawful attempt to isolate him from his family while in custody. The suit, which shifts the focus from the legality of his detention to the conditions of his confinement, alleges that the ICPC has repeatedly prevented his wife, Mrs Aichatou Asabe, and his son, Abba El‑Rufai, from visiting him, despite an existing court order permitting access to his lawyers and personal physicians.
The originating motion, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1852/2026, was filed on Thursday, August 13, 2026, at the Federal High Court in Abuja by El‑Rufai's lawyer, Ubong Akpan. The ICPC Chairman and the Attorney‑General of the Federation have been joined as second and third defendants, respectively, according to court documents sighted by the News Agency of Nigeria. The former governor is seeking nine reliefs, including declarations that his fundamental rights under Part IV of the 1999 Constitution remain enforceable despite his detention.
At the heart of the suit is the allegation that the ICPC's refusal to allow his wife and son access to him has violated his rights to dignity and private and family life, guaranteed under Sections 34 and 37 of the Constitution and Articles 5 and 18 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. El‑Rufai argued that the denial of access has had practical consequences beyond preventing family visits, as his wife and son were allegedly unable to provide him with food, medication and other necessities.
The former governor specifically alleged that on July 7, 2026, ICPC officers physically restrained and intimidated his wife and son, describing the incident as an arbitrary interference with his spousal and filial relationships. He further alleged that the denial of access without lawful justification or a court order has subjected him to "humiliation, emotional trauma, anxiety and psychological distress." The affidavit in support of the suit, deposed to by El‑Rufai's Principal Secretary, Mohammed Shaba, said the information was supplied to him by Asabe on July 12.
Shaba recalled that Justice R. M. Aikawa of the Federal High Court in Kaduna had, on April 1, 2026, ordered the ICPC to allow the defendants access to their counsel and personal physicians whenever they needed to see them. "Clearly, this order reflects the settled principle of law that detainees are not to be held incommunicado and that the ICPC is subject to judicial oversight regarding the conditions of detention," the affidavit stated. El‑Rufai argued that this court order should be read alongside the constitutional safeguards available to persons in detention and provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, which include humane treatment and reasonable access to family members.
El‑Rufai is currently being detained by the ICPC in its Abuja office in connection with an ongoing investigation. He is the first defendant in charge number FHC/KD/73C/2025, pending before the Federal High Court in Kaduna, in which the Federal Republic of Nigeria is the complainant. In February 2026, he had filed a separate N1 billion fundamental rights suit against the ICPC over the alleged unlawful search of his Abuja residence. That suit was later withdrawn, but the legal confrontations have continued. The ICPC has also filed criminal charges against El‑Rufai and seven others over alleged fraud and money laundering linked to a N10.8 billion CCTV security project in Kaduna State.
The case raises a fundamental constitutional question: does detention suspend a person's relationship with his immediate family, or does the Constitution continue to protect those rights even while a criminal investigation or prosecution is under way? El‑Rufai's lawyers argue that incarceration may restrict liberty, but it does not automatically extinguish dignity, privacy, access to counsel, healthcare or reasonable family contact. The suit now places that argument directly against the operational practices of one of Nigeria's principal anti‑corruption agencies.
As the legal battle unfolds, the former governor has asked the court to declare that the respondents' continued denial of family access without lawful authority is unconstitutional and void, and to order them to grant him unhindered and reasonable access to his family members and counsel throughout his detention, in line with the earlier Federal High Court order. The outcome of this case could have far‑reaching implications for the rights of detainees in Nigeria and the limits of state authority over individuals in custody.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters News | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments