Reported by: Ijeoma G | Edited by: Oravbiere Osayomore Promise.
In Kaduna State, Islamic cleric Ahmad Umar has publicly rejected claims that he was detained by the Department of State Services (DSS) following a visit by former presidential candidate Peter Obi. Umar’s clarification comes amid conflicting accounts from political figures and widespread social media speculation about his treatment by security agencies.
The controversy began when Peter Obi posted on social media that Ahmad Umar had been “arrested by authorities” shortly after hosting him during his visit to Kaduna. Obi suggested that the alleged detention was part of a broader pattern of intimidation against political actors and community leaders, framing it as a concerning trend in Nigerian democratic engagement.
Leaders of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) echoed the claim, raising further concerns about interference by security agencies in political activities and amplifying public anxiety online.
However, Ahmad Umar himself swiftly dispelled the allegations in a video that circulated on social media. In the footage, he insisted that he was not arrested or detained by the DSS or any other security agency. He explained that he had been invited for questioning, a routine interaction, and was released without mistreatment. Umar emphasised that he was free, safe, and continuing his normal activities, urging the public to avoid spreading misinformation.
Umar’s statement aimed to calm tensions and correct what he described as a false report, stressing the importance of maintaining peace in Kaduna State. He appealed to supporters and residents to remain law-abiding and not engage in disorder or violence in response to earlier posts. He also encouraged citizens to channel concerns through democratic processes such as voter registration and participation in elections.
In his clarification, Umar referenced broader state issues, including recent legal proceedings involving former governor Nasir El-Rufai, and urged patience and respect for due process, underlining a desire to defuse partisan tension.
Regional media reports confirmed key elements of Umar’s account: that he was neither detained nor mistreated and that his interaction with security officials did not constitute an arrest. Invitations for questioning by agencies like the DSS are not uncommon when prominent figures host high-profile guests or participate in politically sensitive events.
At the time of reporting, neither the DSS nor any official security spokesperson had issued a public statement confirming or denying Obi’s claims. The absence of an official response leaves the public with contrasting accounts from political leaders and the cleric, contributing to ongoing discussion and speculation.
Political analysts note that the dispute highlights broader tensions in Nigeria’s political landscape, especially with upcoming elections. The rapid spread of conflicting narratives around alleged arrests and security agency involvement demonstrates the importance of clear communication in maintaining public confidence.
Supporters from both sides of the debate have urged calm while awaiting definitive information from official sources. Umar’s assertion that he was not detained remains central to the public’s understanding of the episode.
📩 Stone Reporters News | 🌍 stonereportersnews.com
✉️ info@stonereportersnews.com | 📘 Facebook: Stone Reporters | 🐦 X (Twitter): @StoneReportNew | 📸 Instagram: @stonereportersnews
Add comment
Comments